Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study
Do you wish to request the book?
Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study
2026
Overview
Background/Objectives: Integrating technology with caring is essential in modern healthcare, yet the clinical applicability of nursing theories remains underexplored. Locsin’s Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) theory emphasizes the competent use of technology to address patients holistically, rather than focusing solely on health concerns. Here, we explored the interpretive clarity of the TCCN Instrument–Revised for Practice (TCCNI-RePract) items and identified the conceptual barriers encountered by psychiatric nurses when engaging with its theoretical constructs. Methods: This concurrent mixed-methods study surveyed 291 psychiatric nurses across five large hospitals in the Kansai region of Japan. Quantitative data on the TCCNI-RePract perception dimension were examined using descriptive statistics and normality testing. Qualitative open-ended responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To ensure rigor and integration, a joint display was utilized to bridge both data strands. Results: Quantitative findings indicated that nurses strongly endorsed core values of caring (high agreement) but perceived theoretical constructs (wholeness and technological knowing) as significantly more difficult to interpret than concrete, behavior-oriented items. Qualitative analysis revealed four major themes: (1) fragmented understanding of “technology and caring,” (2) struggles with abstract and philosophical language, (3) moral and emotional tensions in caring relationships, and (4) contextual barriers to integrating caring and technology. We found a “semantic gap,” where the professional endorsement of caring values was not automatically translated into the mastery of theoretical lexicon. Conclusions: While psychiatric nurses identify with the moral core of TCCN, a substantial gap exists between abstract theory and clinical practice. For effectiveness, middle-range theories require “clinical translation” that resonates with the moral, emotional, and organizational realities of psychiatric settings.
Publisher
MDPI AG,Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
