Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Nutritional Trade-Offs in Drosophila melanogaster
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Nutritional Trade-Offs in Drosophila melanogaster
Do you wish to request the book?
Nutritional Trade-Offs in Drosophila melanogaster
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Nutritional Trade-Offs in Drosophila melanogaster
2025
Overview
Animals often regulate their nutrient intake according to their physiological needs. There is evidence that different traits require specific nutrient blends, and that animals cannot always maximize all traits with a single diet (“nutritional trade-offs”). However, we still do not have a clear understanding of which traits might be involved in nutritional trade-offs. I compiled data from the Geometric Framework of Nutrition literature on the ratio of proteins and carbohydrates that maximize (best PC ratios) or minimize (worst PC ratios) several larval and adult traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Best and worst PC ratios clustered into three regions in the protein-carbohydrate nutrient space: (1) Low PC ratios (1:8 or higher) are best for lifespan but worst for growth or reproductive traits; (2) High PC ratios (1:1 or lower) are best for adult body mass, male reproduction, and larval developmental time but worst for lifespan; and (3) Intermediate PC ratios (<1:1 and >1:8) are best for female lifetime egg production, female reproductive rate, and larval survival. These findings support lifespan–reproduction nutritional trade-offs, highlight the potential for metamorphosis to solve nutritional trade-offs across life stages, and underscore the potential for intralocus sexual conflict to emerge over the expression of metabolic genes.
