Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection
Do you wish to request the book?
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection
2013
Overview
PurposePropofol injection is known to cause distressing pain, and various methods have been used to decrease this pain. We investigated the efficacy of the lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations on modulating propofol injection pain.MethodsNinety ASA I/II patients aged 20–60 years were randomly assigned to three groups to receive lidocaine 20 mg (group L), lidocaine 20 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg (group LM), or lidocaine 20 mg + ketamine 5 mg (group LK), respectively, with venous occlusion for 1 min using a forearm tourniquet. Propofol 0.5 mg/kg was subsequently administered into a dorsal hand vein, and pain was assessed during its injection using a verbal rating score. The results were analyzed statistically with analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test, where appropriate. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe incidence of pain was rated to be significantly less in patients in groups LM (40 %) and LK (6.7 %) than in those in group L (83.3 %) (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The pain score [median (range)] was also significantly less in patients in groups LM [0 (0–3)] and LK [0 (0–2)] than in those in group L [2 (0–3)] (p = 0.001 for both groups).ConclusionThe lidocaine–ketamine combination is most effective for decreasing the pain on propofol injection.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
