MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges
Journal Article

Native versus non‐native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges

2016
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
AIM: To determine whether one of the most invasive pine species introduced to the Southern Hemisphere, Pinus contorta, has changed plant species richness, composition, diversity, and litter depth where it has invaded into native open forest, shrub steppe and grassland communities and to assess whether changes were similar in its native and introduced ranges. LOCATION: Río Negro Province, Argentina; Aysén and Araucanía Regions, Chile; Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. METHODS: We measured changes in plant species richness, species composition and cover, diversity, and litter depth associated with increasing P. contorta tree cover along the invasion front at three sites in the introduced range (Argentina and Chile) and one in the native range (Montana, USA). RESULTS: Plant species richness and cover generally declined with increasing P. contorta canopy cover, at similar rates in both the introduced and native ranges. However, plant cover was not affected by P. contorta in a forested setting in the introduced range. P. contorta invasion explained more of the decline in species richness in the introduced than native range. Native species composition changed more strongly across the invasion gradient in the introduced than native range. Litter depth increased more rapidly with P. contorta cover in the native than introduced range. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential of pines to alter plant communities whether encroaching from forests in the native range or from plantations in the introduced range. Species richness and plant cover declined in both settings; however, individual species abundance and species composition were more impacted in the introduced range than in the native range. We suggest that invading trees have a greater capacity to cause ecological impacts in their introduced than in their native range, particularly where they represent a novel life‐form.