MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results
Journal Article

Relationship between leukoaraiosis, carotid intima-media thickness and intima-media thickness variability: Preliminary results

2016
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective To assess the relationship between the degree of leukoaraiosis (LA), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and intima-media thickness variability (IMTV). Materials and methods Sixty-one consecutive patients, who underwent a brain MRI examination and a carotid artery ultrasound, were included in this retrospective study, which conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was waived. In each patient, right/left carotid arteries and brain hemispheres were assessed using automated software for IMT, IMTV and LA volume. Results The mean hemispheric LA volume was 2,224 mm 3 (SD 2,702 mm 3 ) and there was no statistically significant difference in LA volume between the right and left hemispheres (p value = 0.628). The mean IMT and IMTV values were 0.866 mm (SD 0.170) and 0.143 mm (SD 0.100), respectively, without significant differences between the right and left sides (p values 0.733 and 0.098, respectively). The correlation coefficient between IMTV and LA volume was 0.41 (p value = 0.0001), and 0.246 (p value = 0.074) between IMT and LA volume. Conclusions IMTV significantly correlates with LA volume. Further studies are warranted to verify whether this parameter can be used clinically as a marker of cerebrovascular risk. Key Points • Intima-media thickness variability (IMTV) significantly correlates with leukoaraiosis volume. • IMTV could be used as a marker for cerebrovascular risk. • IMTV seems to be a better predictor of weighted mean difference than IMT.