Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Single dose moxidectin versus ivermectin for Onchocerca volvulus infection in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
by
Opoku, Nicholas O
, Halleux, Christine M
, Mambandu, Germain L
, Bolay, Fatorma
, Vaillant, Michel
, Howard, Hayford
, Larbelee, Jemmah P
, Kpawor, Mawolo
, Kasonia, Kambale
, Kanza, Eric M
, Masembe, Safari L
, Kuesel, Annette C
, Bakajika, Didier K
, Kataliko, Kambale
, Bolay, Kpehe M
, Nyathirombo, Amos
, Nigo, Maurice M
, Mumbere, Mupenzi
, Asare, Sampson
, Olipoh, George
, Attah, Simon K
in
Adolescent
/ Animals
/ Anthelmintics - administration & dosage
/ Anthelmintics - adverse effects
/ Clinical trials
/ Democratic Republic of the Congo - epidemiology
/ Density
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Double-blind studies
/ Drug dosages
/ Effectiveness
/ Endemic Diseases
/ Evidence-based medicine
/ Female
/ Filariasis
/ Ghana - epidemiology
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Ivermectin
/ Ivermectin - administration & dosage
/ Ivermectin - adverse effects
/ Liberia - epidemiology
/ Macrolides - administration & dosage
/ Macrolides - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Microfilariae - drug effects
/ Model testing
/ Morbidity
/ Motivation
/ Onchocerca volvulus
/ Onchocerciasis
/ Onchocerciasis - drug therapy
/ Onchocerciasis - epidemiology
/ Parasite Load
/ Parasites
/ Parasitic diseases
/ Population
/ Public health
/ Skin
/ Skin - parasitology
/ Tablets
/ Vector-borne diseases
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Single dose moxidectin versus ivermectin for Onchocerca volvulus infection in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
by
Opoku, Nicholas O
, Halleux, Christine M
, Mambandu, Germain L
, Bolay, Fatorma
, Vaillant, Michel
, Howard, Hayford
, Larbelee, Jemmah P
, Kpawor, Mawolo
, Kasonia, Kambale
, Kanza, Eric M
, Masembe, Safari L
, Kuesel, Annette C
, Bakajika, Didier K
, Kataliko, Kambale
, Bolay, Kpehe M
, Nyathirombo, Amos
, Nigo, Maurice M
, Mumbere, Mupenzi
, Asare, Sampson
, Olipoh, George
, Attah, Simon K
in
Adolescent
/ Animals
/ Anthelmintics - administration & dosage
/ Anthelmintics - adverse effects
/ Clinical trials
/ Democratic Republic of the Congo - epidemiology
/ Density
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Double-blind studies
/ Drug dosages
/ Effectiveness
/ Endemic Diseases
/ Evidence-based medicine
/ Female
/ Filariasis
/ Ghana - epidemiology
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Ivermectin
/ Ivermectin - administration & dosage
/ Ivermectin - adverse effects
/ Liberia - epidemiology
/ Macrolides - administration & dosage
/ Macrolides - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Microfilariae - drug effects
/ Model testing
/ Morbidity
/ Motivation
/ Onchocerca volvulus
/ Onchocerciasis
/ Onchocerciasis - drug therapy
/ Onchocerciasis - epidemiology
/ Parasite Load
/ Parasites
/ Parasitic diseases
/ Population
/ Public health
/ Skin
/ Skin - parasitology
/ Tablets
/ Vector-borne diseases
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Single dose moxidectin versus ivermectin for Onchocerca volvulus infection in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
by
Opoku, Nicholas O
, Halleux, Christine M
, Mambandu, Germain L
, Bolay, Fatorma
, Vaillant, Michel
, Howard, Hayford
, Larbelee, Jemmah P
, Kpawor, Mawolo
, Kasonia, Kambale
, Kanza, Eric M
, Masembe, Safari L
, Kuesel, Annette C
, Bakajika, Didier K
, Kataliko, Kambale
, Bolay, Kpehe M
, Nyathirombo, Amos
, Nigo, Maurice M
, Mumbere, Mupenzi
, Asare, Sampson
, Olipoh, George
, Attah, Simon K
in
Adolescent
/ Animals
/ Anthelmintics - administration & dosage
/ Anthelmintics - adverse effects
/ Clinical trials
/ Democratic Republic of the Congo - epidemiology
/ Density
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Double-blind studies
/ Drug dosages
/ Effectiveness
/ Endemic Diseases
/ Evidence-based medicine
/ Female
/ Filariasis
/ Ghana - epidemiology
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Ivermectin
/ Ivermectin - administration & dosage
/ Ivermectin - adverse effects
/ Liberia - epidemiology
/ Macrolides - administration & dosage
/ Macrolides - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Microfilariae - drug effects
/ Model testing
/ Morbidity
/ Motivation
/ Onchocerca volvulus
/ Onchocerciasis
/ Onchocerciasis - drug therapy
/ Onchocerciasis - epidemiology
/ Parasite Load
/ Parasites
/ Parasitic diseases
/ Population
/ Public health
/ Skin
/ Skin - parasitology
/ Tablets
/ Vector-borne diseases
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Single dose moxidectin versus ivermectin for Onchocerca volvulus infection in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
Journal Article
Single dose moxidectin versus ivermectin for Onchocerca volvulus infection in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The morbidity and socioeconomic effects of onchocerciasis, a parasitic disease that is primarily endemic in sub-Saharan Africa, have motivated large morbidity and transmission control programmes. Annual community-directed ivermectin treatment has substantially reduced prevalence. Elimination requires intensified efforts, including more efficacious treatments. We compared parasitological efficacy and safety of moxidectin and ivermectin.
This double-blind, parallel group, superiority trial was done in four sites in Ghana, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. We enrolled participants (aged ≥12 years) with at least 10 Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae per mg skin who were not co-infected with Loa loa or lymphatic filariasis microfilaraemic. Participants were randomly allocated, stratified by sex and level of infection, to receive a single oral dose of 8 mg moxidectin or 150 μg/kg ivermectin as overencapsulated oral tablets. The primary efficacy outcome was skin microfilariae density 12 months post treatment. We used a mixed-effects model to test the hypothesis that the primary efficacy outcome in the moxidectin group was 50% or less than that in the ivermectin group. The primary efficacy analysis population were all participants who received the study drug and completed 12-month follow-up (modified intention to treat). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00790998.
Between April 22, 2009, and Jan 23, 2011, we enrolled and allocated 998 participants to moxidectin and 501 participants to ivermectin. 978 received moxidectin and 494 ivermectin, of which 947 and 480 were included in primary efficacy outcome analyses. At 12 months, skin microfilarial density (microfilariae per mg of skin) was lower in the moxidectin group (adjusted geometric mean 0·6 [95% CI 0·3–1·0]) than in the ivermectin group (4·5 [3·5–5·9]; difference 3·9 [3·2–4·9], p<0·0001; treatment difference 86%). Mazzotti (ie, efficacy-related) reactions occurred in 967 (99%) of 978 moxidectin-treated participants and in 478 (97%) of 494 ivermectin-treated participants, including ocular reactions (moxidectin 113 [12%] participants and ivermectin 47 [10%] participants), laboratory reactions (788 [81%] and 415 [84%]), and clinical reactions (944 [97%] and 446 [90%]). No serious adverse events were considered to be related to treatment.
Skin microfilarial loads (ie, parasite transmission reservoir) are lower after moxidectin treatment than after ivermectin treatment. Moxidectin would therefore be expected to reduce parasite transmission between treatment rounds more than ivermectin could, thus accelerating progress towards elimination.
UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited,Elsevier
Subject
/ Animals
/ Anthelmintics - administration & dosage
/ Anthelmintics - adverse effects
/ Democratic Republic of the Congo - epidemiology
/ Density
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Ivermectin - administration & dosage
/ Ivermectin - adverse effects
/ Macrolides - administration & dosage
/ Macrolides - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Microfilariae - drug effects
/ Onchocerciasis - drug therapy
/ Onchocerciasis - epidemiology
/ Skin
/ Tablets
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.