Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Exercise interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: a systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Exercise interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: a systematic review
Do you wish to request the book?
Exercise interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: a systematic review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Exercise interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: a systematic review
2021
Overview
To assess the reporting quality of exercise interventions from clinical trials of low back pain (LBP).
We conducted a systematic review to assess the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of exercise interventions for patients with LBP. Five online databases and Clinical Trial Registries were searched (October 2018). We included RCTs that reported interventions for LBP, containing at least 50% exercise. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) reporting checklists were then used to assess quality of reporting.
582 trials were eligible for inclusion. Due to the large number of eligible studies, 100 studies were randomly selected for data extraction and coding with the TIDieR and CERT checklists. The random sample was representative of the 582 eligible trials. The overall completeness of reporting (median (IQR)) of TIDieR items was 59.2% (45.5%–72.7%) and CERT was 33.3% (22.2%–52.6%).
We found poor overall reporting with both checklists, which has not improved over time or since the introduction of the checklists. More dedicated work is required to address poor reporting of exercise interventions in clinical trials.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
Subject
/ Biomedical Research - standards
/ Biomedical Research - statistics & numerical data
/ CERT
/ Clinical Trials as Topic - standards
/ Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data
/ Exercise
/ Exercise Therapy - statistics & numerical data
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Pain
/ Research Design - statistics & numerical data
/ TIDieR
