Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience
by
Poli, Loris
, Bertella, Enrica
, Filosto, Massimiliano
, Gazzina, Stefano
, Giovanelli, Giorgia
, Ferullo, Lucia
, Olivieri, Emanuele
, Labella, Beatrice
, Caria, Filomena
, Padovani, Alessandro
, Leggio, Ugo
, Risi, Barbara
in
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
/ Awaji criteria
/ Brief Report
/ Cerebrospinal fluid
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical trials
/ Development and progression
/ Diagnosis
/ Disease
/ Electromyography
/ Gold Coast criteria
/ Health aspects
/ Laboratories
/ motor neuron disease
/ Neuromuscular diseases
/ Neurophysiology
/ revised El Escorial criteria
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Work experience
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience
by
Poli, Loris
, Bertella, Enrica
, Filosto, Massimiliano
, Gazzina, Stefano
, Giovanelli, Giorgia
, Ferullo, Lucia
, Olivieri, Emanuele
, Labella, Beatrice
, Caria, Filomena
, Padovani, Alessandro
, Leggio, Ugo
, Risi, Barbara
in
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
/ Awaji criteria
/ Brief Report
/ Cerebrospinal fluid
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical trials
/ Development and progression
/ Diagnosis
/ Disease
/ Electromyography
/ Gold Coast criteria
/ Health aspects
/ Laboratories
/ motor neuron disease
/ Neuromuscular diseases
/ Neurophysiology
/ revised El Escorial criteria
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Work experience
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience
by
Poli, Loris
, Bertella, Enrica
, Filosto, Massimiliano
, Gazzina, Stefano
, Giovanelli, Giorgia
, Ferullo, Lucia
, Olivieri, Emanuele
, Labella, Beatrice
, Caria, Filomena
, Padovani, Alessandro
, Leggio, Ugo
, Risi, Barbara
in
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
/ Awaji criteria
/ Brief Report
/ Cerebrospinal fluid
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical trials
/ Development and progression
/ Diagnosis
/ Disease
/ Electromyography
/ Gold Coast criteria
/ Health aspects
/ Laboratories
/ motor neuron disease
/ Neuromuscular diseases
/ Neurophysiology
/ revised El Escorial criteria
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Work experience
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience
Journal Article
Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria are currently used for diagnosing and categorizing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, they are complex; their sensitivity is still not optimal for research purposes, and they present high inter-rater variability in clinical practice. To address these points, in 2019, a new set of diagnostic criteria was proposed, namely the Gold Coast criteria (GCC), characterized by a dichotomous diagnostic categorization, i.e., ALS or not ALS. Methods: In order to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical usefulness of GCC in a practical clinical setting, we retrospectively evaluated 131 patients diagnosed with ALS and 104 control subjects. ALSFRS-R score, electrophysiological tests, neuroradiological investigations, and CSF analysis were obtained. rEEC, Awaji, and GCC were applied at the first and last evaluations. Results: The sensitivity of GCC (93.1%; 96.1%) was greater than rEEC (71.8%; 87%) and Awaji criteria (77.8%; 89.3%) both at the first visit and last follow-up. The GCC’s specificity (28.8%) is lower than that of the other two criteria (rEEC 45.2%; Awaji 43.3%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that in a real-world setting, the GCC are more sensitive and have substantially lower risk of false negative diagnoses than rEEC and Awaji criteria. Although rEEC had the highest specificity, they may delay the diagnosis. Systematically using the GCC could help to achieve an earlier diagnosis and quickly refer patients to the correct management. The low specificity of GCC is likely to not significantly impact patient recruitment in clinical trials; therefore, its use might allow a faster and earlier enrollment.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.