Journal Article

Placebo effects in randomized trials of pharmacological and neurostimulation interventions for mental disorders: An umbrella review

Ioannidis, Konstantinos, Singh, Satneet, Eudave, Luis, Amin, Jay, Cortese, Samuele, Gosling, Corentin J., Huneke, Nathan T. M., Garner, Matthew, Bellato, Alessio, Howes, Oliver D., Hou, Ruihua, Köhler-Forsberg, Ole, Correll, Christoph U., Reed, Claire, Marzulli, Lucia, Baldwin, David S., Hill, Catherine M., Brandt, Valerie, Sinclair, Julia M. A., Chamberlain, Samuel R., Solmi, Marco

2024

Overview

There is a growing literature exploring the placebo response within specific mental disorders, but no overarching quantitative synthesis of this research has analyzed evidence across mental disorders. We carried out an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biological treatments (pharmacotherapy or neurostimulation) for mental disorders. We explored whether placebo effect size differs across distinct disorders, and the correlates of increased placebo effects. Based on a pre-registered protocol, we searched Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge up to 23.10.2022 for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses reporting placebo effect sizes in psychopharmacological or neurostimulation RCTs. Twenty meta-analyses, summarising 1,691 RCTs involving 261,730 patients, were included. Placebo effect size varied, and was large in alcohol use disorder ( g  = 0.90, 95% CI [0.70, 1.09]), depression ( g  = 1.10, 95% CI [1.06, 1.15]), restless legs syndrome ( g  = 1.41, 95% CI [1.25, 1.56]), and generalized anxiety disorder ( d  = 1.85, 95% CI [1.61, 2.09]). Placebo effect size was small-to-medium in obsessive-compulsive disorder ( d  = 0.32, 95% CI [0.22, 0.41]), primary insomnia ( g  = 0.35, 95% CI [0.28, 0.42]), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (standardized mean change = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22, 0.44]). Correlates of larger placebo response in multiple mental disorders included later publication year (opposite finding for ADHD), younger age, more trial sites, larger sample size, increased baseline severity, and larger active treatment effect size. Most (18 of 20) meta-analyses were judged ‘low’ quality as per AMSTAR-2. Placebo effect sizes varied substantially across mental disorders. Future research should explore the sources of this variation. We identified important gaps in the literature, with no eligible systematic reviews/meta-analyses of placebo response in stress-related disorders, eating disorders, behavioural addictions, or bipolar mania.

• Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
• Subject: 631/154 / 631/378 / 692/699/476 / Addictions / Addictive behaviors / Affective disorders / Anxiety disorders / Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder / Behavioral Sciences / Biological Psychology / Clinical trials / Cognitive science / Drug therapy / Eating disorders / Humans / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mental disorders / Mental Disorders - therapy / Meta-analysis / Neurosciences / Obsessive compulsive disorder / Pharmacotherapy / Placebo Effect / Placebos / Psychiatry / Psychology / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Restless legs syndrome / Schizophrenia / Sleep disorders / Systematic Review