Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Content and trend analysis of user-generated nicotine sickness tweets: A retrospective infoveillance study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Content and trend analysis of user-generated nicotine sickness tweets: A retrospective infoveillance study
Do you wish to request the book?
Content and trend analysis of user-generated nicotine sickness tweets: A retrospective infoveillance study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Content and trend analysis of user-generated nicotine sickness tweets: A retrospective infoveillance study
2022
Overview
Exposure to pro-tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) social media content can lead to overconsumption, increasing the likelihood of nicotine poisoning. This study aims to examine trends and characteristics of nicotine sickness content on Twitter between 2018-2020.
Tweets were collected retrospectively from the Twitter Academic Research Application Programming Interface (API) stream filtered for keywords: 'nic sick', 'nicsick', 'vape sick', 'vapesick' between 2018-2020. Collected tweets were manually annotated to identify suspected user-generated reports of nicotine sickness and related themes using an inductive coding approach. The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test was used to assess stationarity in the monthly variation of the volume of tweets between 2018-2020.
A total of 5651 tweets contained nicotine sickness-related keywords and 18.29% (n=1034) tweets reported one or more suspected nicotine sickness symptoms of varied severity. These tweets were also grouped into five related categories including firsthand and secondhand reports of symptoms, intentional overconsumption of nicotine products, users expressing intention to quit after 'nic sick' symptoms, mention of nicotine product type/brand name that they consumed while 'nic sick', and users discussing symptoms associated with nicotine withdrawal following cessation attempts. The volume of tweets reporting suspected nicotine sickness appeared to increase throughout the study period, except between February and April 2020. Stationarity in the volume of 'nicsick' tweets between 2018-2020 was not statistically significant (ADF= -0.32, p=0.98) indicating a change in the volume of tweets.
Results point to the need for alternative forms of adverse event surveillance and reporting, to appropriately capture the growing health burden of vaping. Infoveillance approaches on social media platforms can help to assess the volume and characteristics of user-generated content discussing suspected nicotine poisoning, which may not be reported to poison control centers. Increasing volume of user-reported nicotine sickness and intentional overconsumption of nicotine in twitter posts represent a concerning trend associated with ENDS-related adverse events and poisoning.
Publisher
E.U. European Publishing,European Publishing,European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
