MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions
Journal Article

Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
By providing a structured assessment of specific risk factors, risk assessment tools allow statements to be made about the likelihood of future recidivism in people who have committed a crime. These tools were originally developed for and primarily tested in men and are mainly based on the usual criminological background of men. Despite significant progress in the last decade, there is still a lack of empirical research on female offenders, especially female forensic psychiatric inpatients. To improve prognosis in female offenders, we performed a retrospective study to compare the predictive quality of the following risk assessment tools: PCL-R, LSI-R, HCR-20 v3, FAM, and VRAG-R. Data were collected from the information available in the medical files of 525 female patients who had been discharged between 2001 and 2017. We examined the ability of the tools to predict general and violent recidivism by comparing the predictions with information from the Federal Central Criminal Register. Overall, the prediction instruments had moderate to good predictive performance, and the study confirmed their general applicability to female forensic psychiatric patients. The LSI-R proved to be particularly valid for general recidivism, and both, LSI-R and HCR-20 v3, for violent recidivism. •LSI-R is best suited for predicting general recidivism in female forensic psychiatric patients.•HCR-20 v3 is best suited for predicting violent recidivism in female forensic psychiatric patients.•All instruments exhibit low sensitivity and are not suitable as the sole basis for discharge decisions.•Study's strength: large sample size, long observation period.