Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Public and Patient Involvement in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Healthcare Research: An Exploration of Issues and Challenges Within the AI‐Multiply Project
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Public and Patient Involvement in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Healthcare Research: An Exploration of Issues and Challenges Within the AI‐Multiply Project
Do you wish to request the book?
Public and Patient Involvement in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Healthcare Research: An Exploration of Issues and Challenges Within the AI‐Multiply Project
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Public and Patient Involvement in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Healthcare Research: An Exploration of Issues and Challenges Within the AI‐Multiply Project
2025
Overview
Background Public and patient involvement and engagement (PPIE) is intended to shape research priorities and improve relevance and impact. However, implementing PPIE in complex fields such as artificial intelligence (AI) and big data health research presents specific challenges. This study explores the issues and barriers to meaningful PPIE using the AI‐Multiply project as a case example. Methods AI‐Multiply is a large, interdisciplinary UK‐based research project using AI and routine health data to investigate trajectories of multiple long‐term conditions and polypharmacy. PPIE was embedded across all five work packages. We used a mixed‐methods approach, drawing on CUBE framework surveys, PPIE feedback forms and impact logs to evaluate involvement. Data were analysed thematically using a ‘follow‐a‐thread’ approach to identify key issues across sources. Results Three themes were identified: (1) differing priorities—public contributors prioritised person‐centred outcomes, while researchers focused on data‐driven healthcare metrics, often constrained by data availability; (2) movement on both sides—both researchers and contributors expressed early apprehension, but mutual trust and integration developed over time; and (3) the importance of established guidance—many issues raised echoed longstanding PPIE guidance on clarity, feedback and facilitation. Conclusion While AI and data‐specific challenges exist, many PPIE issues in this context relate to applying existing good practice in complex projects. Strong PPIE leadership, early expectation‐setting and consistent facilitation are critical for success. Findings will inform the development of practical tools to support involvement in data‐driven research. Patient or Public Contribution Public contributors with lived experience of multiple long‐term conditions contributed to the interpretation of data and co‐authored this manuscript.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley
Subject
