Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Opposing functions of two sub-domains of the SNARE-complex in neurotransmission
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Opposing functions of two sub-domains of the SNARE-complex in neurotransmission
Do you wish to request the book?
Opposing functions of two sub-domains of the SNARE-complex in neurotransmission
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Opposing functions of two sub-domains of the SNARE-complex in neurotransmission
2010
Overview
The SNARE‐complex consisting of synaptobrevin‐2/VAMP‐2, SNAP‐25 and syntaxin‐1 is essential for evoked neurotransmission and also involved in spontaneous release. Here, we used cultured autaptic hippocampal neurons from
Snap‐25
null mice rescued with mutants challenging the C‐terminal, N‐terminal and middle domains of the SNARE‐bundle to dissect out the involvement of these domains in neurotransmission. We report that the stabilities of two different sub‐domains of the SNARE‐bundle have opposing functions in setting the probability for both spontaneous and evoked neurotransmission. Destabilizing the C‐terminal end of the SNARE‐bundle abolishes spontaneous neurotransmitter release and reduces evoked release probability, indicating that the C‐terminal end promotes both modes of release. In contrast, destabilizing the middle or deleting the N‐terminal end of the SNARE‐bundle increases both spontaneous and evoked release probabilities. In both cases, spontaneous release was affected more than evoked neurotransmission. In addition, the N‐terminal deletion delays vesicle priming after a high‐frequency train. We propose that the stability of N‐terminal two‐thirds of the SNARE‐bundle has a function for vesicle priming and limiting spontaneous release.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,Nature Publishing Group UK,Springer Nature B.V,Nature Publishing Group
