Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Remote detection of water stress in cotton using a center pivot irrigation system-mounted sensor package
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Remote detection of water stress in cotton using a center pivot irrigation system-mounted sensor package
Do you wish to request the book?
Remote detection of water stress in cotton using a center pivot irrigation system-mounted sensor package
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Remote detection of water stress in cotton using a center pivot irrigation system-mounted sensor package
2024
Overview
Much research has been invested in infrared temperature (IRT)-based methods for cotton (
Gossypium hirsutism
L.) water stress detection using in-field sensors, but adoption of these is low, perhaps due to logistical challenges. Alternatively, the Water Deficit Index (WDI) was developed for crop water stress assessment using remote sensors not embedded in the canopy. The objective of this research was to evaluate the performance of a sensor package—including modern IRT and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) sensors facing downward at 45˚, and a mini weather station—attached unintrusively to a center pivot irrigation system for detecting cotton water stress using WDI. Sensor packages were evaluated in a two-year field study that included four irrigation treatments (0, 30, 60, and 90% ET replacement) and in two production cotton fields. Overall, the tested system was effective at distinguishing crop water stress among irrigation rates. Comparison of the results to a ground-based station and simulations indicated that WDI overestimated water stress at the highest irrigation rate, but performed well otherwise. Accuracy of the system could be improved by measuring canopy coverage (
Fc
) from the same vantage point as the IRT and NDVI sensors (from the pivot, downward at a 45˚ angle).
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
Subject
