Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
Do you wish to request the book?
Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
2024
Overview
Background People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face barriers in cancer care contributing to poorer oncological outcomes. Yet, understanding cancer risks in the ID population remains incomplete. Aim To provide an overview of cancer incidence and cancer risk assessments in the entire ID population as well as within ID‐related disorders. Methods This systematic review examined cancer risk in the entire ID population and ID‐related disorders. We systematically searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE for literature from January 1, 2000 to July 15, 2022 using a search strategy combining terms related to cancer, incidence, and ID. Results We found 55 articles assessing cancer risks in the ID population at large groups or in subgroups with ID‐related syndromes, indicating that overall cancer risk in the ID population is lower or comparable with that of the general population, while specific disorders (e.g., Down's syndrome) and certain genetic mutations may elevate the risk for particular cancers. Discussion The heterogeneity within the ID population challenges precise cancer risk assessment at the population level. Nonetheless, within certain subgroups, such as individuals with specific ID‐related disorders or certain genetic mutations, a more distinct pattern of varying cancer risks compared to the general population becomes apparent. Conclusion More awareness, and personalized approach in cancer screening within the ID population is necessary.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
Subject
