Journal Article

Linking camera‐trap data to taxonomy: Identifying photographs of morphologically similar chipmunks

McKibben, Fiona E., Frey, Jennifer K.

2021

Overview

Remote cameras are a common method for surveying wildlife and recently have been promoted for implementing large‐scale regional biodiversity monitoring programs. The use of camera‐trap data depends on the correct identification of animals captured in the photographs, yet misidentification rates can be high, especially when morphologically similar species co‐occur, and this can lead to faulty inferences and hinder conservation efforts. Correct identification is dependent on diagnosable taxonomic characters, photograph quality, and the experience and training of the observer. However, keys rooted in taxonomy are rarely used for the identification of camera‐trap images and error rates are rarely assessed, even when morphologically similar species are present in the study area. We tested a method for ensuring high identification accuracy using two sympatric and morphologically similar chipmunk (Neotamias) species as a case study. We hypothesized that the identification accuracy would improve with use of the identification key and with observer training, resulting in higher levels of observer confidence and higher levels of agreement among observers. We developed an identification key and tested identification accuracy based on photographs of verified museum specimens. Our results supported predictions for each of these hypotheses. In addition, we validated the method in the field by comparing remote‐camera data with live‐trapping data. We recommend use of these methods to evaluate error rates and to exclude ambiguous records in camera‐trap datasets. We urge that ensuring correct and scientifically defensible species identifications is incumbent on researchers and should be incorporated into the camera‐trap workflow. Misidentification of animals in camera‐trap data can be high even among experts, compromising its utility. We tested a method for ensuring high identification accuracy using two sympatric and morphologically similar chipmunk (Neotamias) species as a case study. We recommend use of these methods to evaluate error rates and to remove ambiguous records in camera‐trap datasets, and we urge that ensuring correct and scientifically defensible species identifications is incumbent on researchers and should be incorporated into the camera‐trap workflow.

• Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
• Subject: Accuracy / Biodiversity / Cameras / Endangered & extinct species / gray‐footed chipmunk / Identification / Identification keys / Laboratories / misidentification / Museums / Neotamias canipes / Neotamias minimus atristriatus / Original Research / Peñasco least chipmunk / remote camera / Species / Sympatric populations / Taxonomy / Training / Wildlife / Wildlife conservation / Wildlife surveys / Workflow