Journal Article

Clinical practice of one-lung ventilation in mainland China: a nationwide questionnaire survey

Zhang, Hui, He, Yi-na, Cheng, Ning-ning, Chen, Mei-fang, Lin, Yong, Tan, Jie-chao, Mu, Yan, Liu, Xian-wen, Chen, Si-si, Guo, Xiao-hui, Kang, Wen-yue, Yang, Hai, Guo, Pei-lei, Liu, Hong-jin, Li, Wang

2025

Overview

Background Limited information is available regarding the application of lung-protective ventilation strategies during one-lung ventilation (OLV) across mainland China. A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate this issue in current clinical practice. Methods The survey covered various aspects, including respondent demographics, the establishment and maintenance of OLV, intraoperative monitoring standards, and complications associated with OLV. Results Five hundred forty-three valid responses were collected from all provinces in mainland China. Volume control ventilation mode, 4 to 6 mL per kilogram of predictive body weight, pure oxygen inspiration, and a low-level positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 5 cm H 2 O were the most popular ventilation parameters. The most common thresholds of intraoperative respiration monitoring were peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) of 90–94%, end-tidal CO 2 of 45 to 55 mm Hg, and an airway pressure of 30 to 34 cm H 2 O. Recruitment maneuvers were traditionally performed by 94% of the respondents. Intraoperative hypoxemia and laryngeal injury were experienced by 75% and 51% of the respondents, respectively. The proportions of anesthesiologists who frequently experienced hypoxemia during OLV were 19%, 24%, and 7% for lung, cardiovascular, and esophageal surgeries, respectively. Up to 32% of respondents were reluctant to perform lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the volume-control ventilation mode and an SpO 2 intervention threshold of < 85% were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV in lung and cardiovascular surgeries. In esophageal surgery, working in a tier 2 hospital and using traditional ventilation strategies were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in intraoperative hypoxemia during OLV between respondents who performed lung-protective ventilation strategies and those who did not. Conclusions Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV have been widely accepted in mainland China and are strongly recommended for esophageal surgery, particularly in tier 2 hospitals. Implementing volume control ventilation mode and early management of oxygen desaturation might prevent hypoxemia during OLV.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Anaerobic threshold / Anesthesiologists / Anesthesiology / Artificial respiration / Body weight / Bronchoscopy / Carbon dioxide / Cardiovascular diseases / Cardiovascular system / Care and treatment / China - epidemiology / Clinical medicine / Complications and side effects / Continuous positive airway pressure / Critical Care Medicine / Diagnosis / Emergency Medicine / Esophagus / Female / Health aspects / Heart surgery / Humans / Hypoxemia / Hypoxia / Hypoxia - epidemiology / Hypoxia - etiology / Hypoxia - prevention & control / Intensive / Internal Medicine / Intubation / Lung protective ventilation / Lungs / Male / Mechanical ventilation / Medical personnel / Medical prognosis / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods / Multiple regression analysis / One-lung ventilation / One-Lung Ventilation - methods / Patient outcomes / Postoperative pulmonary complications / Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data / Questionnaires / Risk factors / Software / Surgery / Surveys / Surveys and Questionnaires / Thoracic surgery / Ventilation / Ventilator-associated pneumonia / Ventilators / Volume control ventilation