MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)
Journal Article

Defining obstruction in COPD: do fixed ratio and lower limit of normal criteria reflect different clinical characteristics? findings from a Greek cross-sectional study (EMENO)

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background and objectives In epidemiological research, spirometry is commonly used to estimate prevalence of COPD, as reliance on imprecisely delineated symptoms may introduce bias. Actually, the prevalence of airflow limitation in adults with no prior asthma diagnosis was studied using two different cut-offs for the FEV₁/FVC ratio: the fixed ratio (FR) and the lower limit of normal (LLN), based on data from the EMENO survey. Our objective was to estimate COPD prevalence in Greece under both definitions and to compare associated clinical features and comorbidities. Methods The EMENO study was a population-based survey (2014–2016) of 6,006 adults (≥18 years). This analysis included 2,450 participants aged 30–91 years, with high-quality spirometry and no prior asthma diagnosis. Airflow limitation indicative of COPD was defined by pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70 (FR) and FEV1/FVC < LLN; self-reported COPD (SRPD) was also analyzed. Comorbidities and demographics were assessed through interviews and medical exams. Results COPD prevalence was 8.51% (FR), 5.33% (LLN), and 1.97% (SRPD). It was more common in men (13.2% FR+ and 8.5% LLN+), with the highest prevalence among current smokers (11.6%, FR; 9.1%, LLN). Prevalence was also higher in participants reporting respiratory symptoms. The FR+/LLN− (discordant) group was strongly associated with older age, blue-collar occupations, and comorbidities. Concordant cases (FR+/LLN+) had a higher prevalence of smoking and respiratory symptoms compared to discordant cases. Obesity was inversely associated with COPD under the LLN criterion, while sleep apnea syndrome increased the odds of concordant COPD. Conclusion COPD prevalence in Greece differed according to the obstructive threshold applied, with discordant and concordant cases showing distinct demographic and clinical risk profiles. The higher prevalence of obstruction among symptomatic participants further supports the use of spirometry as a valid surrogate in epidemiological studies. Overall, reliance on a single definition may misrepresent the true burden and heterogeneity of the disease.