MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Journal Article

Operative outcomes, complications, and functional recovery of lateral-position direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Hip replacement is a standard treatment for femoral neck fractures, but the optimal surgical approach remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the lateral-position direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 56 patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty between February 2019 and September 2022. Patients were classified into a PLA group ( n  = 28) and a DAA group (lateral-position DAA, n  = 28). Perioperative indices, postoperative pain assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, quality-of-life measures, and early postoperative complications were evaluated. Results The DAA group had a shorter operation time (100.54 ± 11.64 min vs. 110.48 ± 22.32 min, p  = 0.041), smaller incision length (9.31 ± 0.31 cm vs. 12.31 ± 1.21 cm, p  < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (214.95 ± 32.22 mL vs. 268.49 ± 23.53 mL, p  < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10.68 ± 3.31 days vs. 17.49 ± 2.21 days, p  < 0.001) compared with the PLA group. VAS scores were lower in the DAA group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 (all p  < 0.001). Harris Hip Scores and Barthel Index scores were higher at discharge and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (all p  < 0.001). The incidence of early postoperative complications was lower in the DAA group than in the PLA group (7.14% vs. 42.86%, p  = 0.002), including a reduced rate of hip dislocation (3.57% vs. 25.00%). Conclusion Lateral-position DAA using conventional instruments was associated with improved perioperative outcomes, faster early functional recovery, and fewer early complications compared with PLA in this retrospective cohort. These findings suggest that lateral-position DAA may be a feasible alternative approach; however, prospective studies are required to confirm these results.