MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
Journal Article

The anesthesiologist’s perspective in choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic urological surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Comparative studies between robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) primarily focus on surgical outcomes, with limited emphasis on the anesthesiologist's perspective. This study aimed to compare anesthesia-related Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) outcomes to inform surgical decision-making. Methods This retrospective study included 831 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy or radical prostatectomy for renal or prostate cancer between September 2021 and October 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:1 ratio based on age, gender, BMI, surgery type, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included anesthesia time, surgical time, recovery time, and resting/activity VAS scores on postoperative day one (POD1). Secondary outcomes comprised ambulation status, nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and anxiety incidence. Safety indicators were pharyngeal pain, respiratory depression, and oxygen requirement. Results After PSM, 252 patients were allocated to each group. The RALS group demonstrated significantly longer anesthesia and surgical times compared to the CLS group ( P < 0.05). PACU recovery time showed no significant difference. While Rest-VAS on POD1 was similar, Act-VAS was significantly higher in the RALS group ( P <0.05). The proportion of patients achieving autonomous mobilization (Grade 1) was significantly lower in the RALS group( P <0.01). Incidences of nausea/vomiting and dizziness were significantly higher in the RALS group ( P <0.05). Anxiety incidence was significantly lower in the RALS group ( P <0.05). No significant differences were found in sore throat, respiratory depression, or oxygen requirement rates. Conclusions These findings suggest that from an anesthesiological perspective, RALS is associated with longer surgical and anesthesia time. The observed differences in postoperative recovery indicators highlight the importance of considering patient physiological reserve when selecting a surgical approach. However, given the observational nature of this study, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.