MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts
Journal Article

A new model for zircon saturation in silicate melts

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A new model describing zircon saturation in silicate melts is presented that combines the results of 196 data from new experiments with data from previous experimental studies. In the new experiments, the concentration of Zr in melts coexisting with zircon was determined at temperatures between 800 and 1500 °C for 21 compositions (with alumina saturation index, ASI, from 0.20 to 1.15), containing ~ 1 to 16 wt % FeO T and, for a subset of these conditions, at variable pressure (0.0001 to 4.0 GPa) and water content (0 to 15 wt %). The collated dataset contains 626 data, with 430 from 26 literature studies, and covers conditions from 750 to 1620 °C, (including 45 new data and 106 literature data for temperatures < 1000 °C), ASI 0.20 to 2.00, 0.0001 to 4.0 GPa and 0 to 17 wt % H 2 O. A limitation of previous models of zircon saturation is the choice of parameter used to describe the silicate melt, which may not be appropriate for all compositions and can result in differences in predicted temperatures of over 200 °C for granitic systems. Here we use optical basicity ( Λ ), which can be easily calculated from the major oxide components of a melt, to parameterise the composition. Using a non-linear least-squares multiple regression, the new zircon saturation model is: log Zr = 0.96 ( 5 ) - 5790 ( 95 ) / T - 1.28 ( 8 ) P + 12.39 ( 35 ) Λ + 0.83 ( 9 ) x . H 2 O + 2.06 ( 16 ) P Λ where Zr is in ppm, T is temperature in K, P is pressure in GPa, Λ is the optical basicity of the melt, x .H 2 O is the mole fraction of water in the melt, and the errors are 1σ. This model confirms that temperature and melt composition are the dominant controls on zircon solubility. In addition, pressure and melt water content exert small but resolvable effects on the solubility and are included, for the first time, in a model. Using this new calibration, 92% of the predicted temperatures are within 10% of the experimental temperatures for the collated dataset (with an average temperature difference of 57 °C), while predicted temperatures for only 78 and 62% of the collated dataset are within 10% of the experimental temperature (with average temperature differences > 80 °C) using the widely cited Watson and Harrison (Earth Planet Sci Lett 64:295–304, 1983) and Boehnke et al. (Chem Geol 351:324–334, 2013) models, respectively. This new model can be extrapolated to temperatures below those included in the calibration with greater accuracy and when applied to melt inclusions from the Bishop Tuff, gives temperatures that are in excellent agreement with independent estimates.