Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals
by
Puljak, Livia
, Janackovic, Katja
in
Abstracts
/ Analysis
/ Anesthesiology
/ Anesthesiology - standards
/ Bibliographic records
/ Biomedicine
/ Caregivers
/ Checklist
/ Checklist - standards
/ Clinical trials
/ Completeness
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Data Accuracy
/ Guideline Adherence - standards
/ Guidelines as Topic - standards
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact factors
/ Journal Impact Factor
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Pain
/ Periodicals as Topic - standards
/ Randomized controlled trial
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
/ Regional anesthesia
/ Reporting
/ Research Design - standards
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Writing - standards
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals
by
Puljak, Livia
, Janackovic, Katja
in
Abstracts
/ Analysis
/ Anesthesiology
/ Anesthesiology - standards
/ Bibliographic records
/ Biomedicine
/ Caregivers
/ Checklist
/ Checklist - standards
/ Clinical trials
/ Completeness
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Data Accuracy
/ Guideline Adherence - standards
/ Guidelines as Topic - standards
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact factors
/ Journal Impact Factor
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Pain
/ Periodicals as Topic - standards
/ Randomized controlled trial
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
/ Regional anesthesia
/ Reporting
/ Research Design - standards
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Writing - standards
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals
by
Puljak, Livia
, Janackovic, Katja
in
Abstracts
/ Analysis
/ Anesthesiology
/ Anesthesiology - standards
/ Bibliographic records
/ Biomedicine
/ Caregivers
/ Checklist
/ Checklist - standards
/ Clinical trials
/ Completeness
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Data Accuracy
/ Guideline Adherence - standards
/ Guidelines as Topic - standards
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact factors
/ Journal Impact Factor
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Pain
/ Periodicals as Topic - standards
/ Randomized controlled trial
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
/ Regional anesthesia
/ Reporting
/ Research Design - standards
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Writing - standards
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals
Journal Article
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) in the highest-impact anesthesiology journals.
Methods
This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, methodological study. We analyzed whether abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the highest-impact anesthesiology journals between 2014 and 2016 adhered with CONSORT-A. RCT abstracts published in the seven first-quartile journals in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) category Anesthesiology were analyzed. The primary outcome was adherence to the 17-item CONSORT-A checklist. Secondary outcomes were adherence to individual checklist items and adherence with the checklist across the individual journals.
Results
Search results yielded 688 records, of which 622 abstracts were analyzed. Analysis of the total score of the CONSORT-A checklist indicated a per-article median of 41% (interquartile range 35–53%). The
European Journal of Anesthesiology
had the highest overall adherence rate (53%), whereas
Anaesthesia
had the lowest (32%). The lowest adherence was observed for the following items: Trial design (18%), Contact of the authors as an e-mail address of the corresponding author (16%), Recruitment status (9%), Number of participants analyzed (8%), Randomization (3%), and Funding (0.2%).
Conclusions
RCT abstracts published in top anesthesiology journals are poorly reported, providing insufficient information to readers. Interventions are needed to increase adherence to relevant reporting checklists for writing RCT abstracts.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.