Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields
Do you wish to request the book?
CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields
2018
Overview
The hippocampus plays a critical role in spatial and episodic memory. Mechanistic models predict that hippocampal subfields have computational specializations that differentially support memory. However, there is little empirical evidence suggesting differences between the subfields, particularly in humans. To clarify how hippocampal subfields support human spatial and episodic memory, we developed a virtual reality paradigm where participants passively navigated through houses (spatial contexts) across a series of videos (episodic contexts). We then used multivariate analyses of high-resolution fMRI data to identify neural representations of contextual information during recollection. Multi-voxel pattern similarity analyses revealed that CA1 represented objects that shared an episodic context as more similar than those from different episodic contexts. CA23DG showed the opposite pattern, differentiating between objects encountered in the same episodic context. The complementary characteristics of these subfields explain how we can parse our experiences into cohesive episodes while retaining the specific details that support vivid recollection.
Computational studies have hinted that hippocampal subfields represent information differently. Here, the authors show that when retrieving items that share an episodic context, subfield CA1 represent similarities between items whereas CA2/3/dentate gyrus represents item-unique features.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
