Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Identifying a parameterisation of the soil water retention curve from on-ground GPR measurements
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Identifying a parameterisation of the soil water retention curve from on-ground GPR measurements
Do you wish to request the book?
Identifying a parameterisation of the soil water retention curve from on-ground GPR measurements
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Identifying a parameterisation of the soil water retention curve from on-ground GPR measurements
2013
Overview
We show the potential of on-ground Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) to identify the parameterisation of the soil water retention curve, i.e. its functional form, with a semi-quantitative analysis based on numerical simulations of the radar signal. An imbibition and drainage experiment has been conducted at the ASSESS-GPR site to establish a fluctuating water table, while an on-ground GPR antenna recorded traces over time at a fixed location. These measurements allow to identify and track the capillary fringe in the soil. The typical dynamics of soil water content with a transient water table can be deduced from the recorded radargrams. The characteristic reflections from the capillary fringes in model soils that are described by commonly used hydraulic parameterisations are investigated by numerical simulations. The parameterisations used are (i) full van Genuchten, (ii) simplified van Genuchten with m = 1 − 1/n and (iii) Brooks–Corey. All three yield characteristically different reflections, which allows the identification of an appropriate parameterisation by comparing to the measured signals. We show that for the sand used here, these signals are not consistent with the commonly used simplified van Genuchten parameterisation with m = 1 − 1/n.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH,Copernicus Publications
Subject
