Journal Article

The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method

Smith, Justin D., Norton, Wynne E., Osarogiagbon, Raymond U., Ridgeway, Jennifer L., DiMartino, Lisa D., Mitchell, Sandra A., Richardson, Joshua E., Garcia, Sofia F., Austin, Jessica D., Battestilli, Whitney, Cronin, Christine, Tesch, Nathan K., Dizon, Don S., Hassett, Michael J., Cella, David, Cheville, Andrea L.

2023

Overview

Background Systematic approaches are needed to accurately characterize the dynamic use of implementation strategies and how they change over time. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS), a novel methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time. Methods The development and initial evaluation of the LISTS method was conducted within the I mproving the M anagement of Sym P toms during A nd following C ancer T reatment (IMPACT) Research Consortium (supported by funding provided through the NCI Cancer Moonshot SM ). The IMPACT Consortium includes a coordinating center and three hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies testing routine symptom surveillance and integration of symptom management interventions in ambulatory oncology care settings. LISTS was created to increase the precision and reliability of dynamic changes in implementation strategy use over time. It includes three components: (1) a strategy assessment, (2) a data capture platform, and (3) a User’s Guide. An iterative process between implementation researchers and practitioners was used to develop, pilot test, and refine the LISTS method prior to evaluating its use in three stepped-wedge trials within the IMPACT Consortium. The LISTS method was used with research and practice teams for approximately 12 months and subsequently we evaluated its feasibility, acceptability, and usability using established instruments and novel questions developed specifically for this study. Results Initial evaluation of LISTS indicates that it is a feasible and acceptable method, with content validity, for characterizing and tracking the use of implementation strategies over time. Users of LISTS highlighted several opportunities for improving the method for use in future and more diverse implementation studies. Conclusions The LISTS method was developed collaboratively between researchers and practitioners to fill a research gap in systematically tracking implementation strategy use and modifications in research studies and other implementation efforts. Preliminary feedback from LISTS users indicate it is feasible and usable. Potential future developments include additional features, fewer data elements, and interoperability with alternative data entry platforms. LISTS offers a systematic method that encourages the use of common data elements to support data analysis across sites and synthesis across studies. Future research is needed to further adapt, refine, and evaluate the LISTS method in studies with employ diverse study designs and address varying delivery settings, health conditions, and intervention types.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BMC
• Subject: Common data elements / Health Administration / Health Policy / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Health Services Research / Implementation strategies / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methodology / Modifications / Public Health / Reporting / Specification