MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study
Journal Article

Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before–after comparative study

2013
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose Airway management in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is challenging. The main objective of this study was to compare the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation between a combo videolaryngoscope and the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in critically ill patients. Methods In the context of the implementation of a quality-improvement process for airway management, we performed a prospective interventional monocenter before–after study which evaluated a new combo videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (defined by Cormack grade 3–4) and/or difficult intubation (more than two attempts). The secondary outcomes were the severe life-threatening complications related to intubation in ICU and the rate of difficult intubation in cases of predicted difficult intubation evaluated by a specific score (MACOCHA score ≥3). Results Two hundred and ten non-selected consecutive intubation procedures were included, 140 in the standard laryngoscope group and 70 in the combo videolaryngoscope group. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation was 16 % in the laryngoscope group vs. 4 % in the combo videolaryngoscope group ( p  = 0.01). The severe life-threatening complications related to intubation did not differ between groups (16 vs. 14 %, p  = 0.79). Among the 32 patients with a MACOCHA score ≥3, there were significantly more patients with difficult intubation in the standard laryngoscope group in comparison to the combo videolaryngoscope group [12/23 (57 %) vs. 0/9 (0 %), p  < 0.01]. Conclusions The systematic use of a combo videolaryngoscope in ICU was associated with a decreased incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation.