Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Do you wish to request the book?
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy
2025
Overview
Background
The quality of colonoscopy is significantly influenced by the effectiveness of bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bowel cleansing between a new oral sulfate solution (OSS) and standard polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG).
Methods
This single center, randomized, superiority study recruited 679 outpatients who were assigned to either the new OSS group (Group A) or standard PEG group (Group B). The quality of bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and compared between the two groups. Furthermore, data pertaining to the duration of bowel preparation, patient tolerability, and the occurrence of adverse events were also analyzed.
Results
According to BBPS scores, group A demonstrated significantly higher bowel preparation cleanliness than group B. Additionally, group A achieved superior bowel cleansing, as evidenced by a greater proportion of patients with BBPS scores ≥ 8 compared to group B (75.3% vs. 55.2%,
P
< 0.05). No severe adverse events were reported during examinations in either group.
Conclusions
The magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and potassium sulfate concentrated oral solution is a novel, safe, and effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Trial registration
This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 20/02/2024 (clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2400081004).
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Cathartics - administration & dosage
/ Cathartics - adverse effects
/ Colon
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Magnesium Sulfate - administration & dosage
/ Magnesium Sulfate - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Methods
/ Patients
/ Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
/ Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects
/ Sodium
/ Sulfates
/ Sulfates - administration & dosage
/ Testing
/ Tumors
/ Water
