MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling
Journal Article

Standardization and evaluation of the LAMP technique for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples using DNA extracted by a silica column and boiling

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) presents a challenge due to a variety of non-specific clinical signs. The available tests have low sensitivity. This study aimed to standardize and evaluate the loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique with K26 target (K26-LAMP) for diagnosis of CVL in conjunctival swab (CS) DNA samples extracted through a silica column commercial kit (SW-kit) and boiling (SW-DB) and to compare sensitivity with conventional PCR (kDNA-cPCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (18S-qPCR). Clinical samples of CSs were collected from 54 dogs after reactive serology tests. Positive parasitological and/or histological tests were used as inclusion criteria for a sensitivity analysis. A total of 79.2% (43/54) of dogs without clinical signs or with mild, moderate, or severe clinical signs were included in the study. The sensitivity results of K26-LAMP, kDNA-cPCR, and 18S-qPCR were 72.1%, 81.4%, and 80.5% with the SW-kit and 97.2%, 95.2%, and 57.1% with SW-DB, respectively. In all techniques, the proportion of positives was higher in the group with severe clinical disease, with statistically significant differences in the K26-LAMP and 18S-qPCR techniques being seen with the SW-kit. The results obtained with LAMP for CS samples are promising and its performance is similar to other techniques.