Journal Article

Case-studies of displacement effects in Dutch hospital care

Wammes, Joost Johan Godert, Paulus, Aggie, Adang, Eddy M. M., Govaert, Paulien, Frederix, Geert, Determann, Domino, Evers, Silvia, Jeurissen, Patrick, Stadhouders, Niek, Oortwijn, Wija

2020

Overview

Background Under a constrained health care budget, cost-increasing technologies may displace funds from existing health services. However, it is unknown what services are displaced and how such displacement takes place in practice. The aim of our study was to investigate how the Dutch hospital sector has dealt with the introduction of cost-increasing health technologies, and to present evidence of the relative importance of three main options to deal with cost-increases in health care: increased spending, increased efficiency, or displacement of other services. Methods We conducted six case-studies and interviewed 84 professionals with various roles and responsibilities (practitioners, heads of clinical department, board of directors, insurers, and others) to investigate how they experienced decision making in response to the cost pressure of cost-increasing health technologies. Transcripts were analyzed thematically in Atlas.ti on the basis of an item list. Results Direct displacement of high-value care due to the introduction of new technologies was not observed; respondents primarily pointed to increased spending and efficiency measures to accommodate the introduction of the cost-increasing technologies. Respondents found it difficult to identify the opportunity costs; partly due to limited transparency in the internal allocation of funds within a hospital. Furthermore, respondents experienced the entry of new technologies and cost-containment as two parallel processes that are generally not causally linked: cost containment was experienced as a permanent issue to level costs and revenues, independent from entry of new technologies. Furthermore, the way of financing was found important in displacement in the Netherlands, especially as there is a separate budget for expensive drugs. This budget pressure was found to be reallocated horizontally across departments, whereas the budget pressure of other services is primarily reallocated vertically within departments or divisions. Respondents noted that hospitals have reacted to budget pressures primarily through a narrowing in the portfolio of their services, and a range of (other) efficiency measures. The board of directors is central in these processes, insurers are involved only to a limited extent. Conclusions Our findings indicate that new technologies were generally accommodated by greater efficiency and increased spending, and that hospitals sought savings or efficiency measures in response to cumulative cost pressures rather than in response to single cost-increasing technologies.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Agreements / Analysis / Appraisals / Basic benefit package / Budgets / Case studies / Clinical decision making / Contract negotiations / Cost analysis / Cost control / Decision making / Diagnosis related groups / Displacement / DRGs / economics and financing systems / Efficiency / expenditure / Health Administration / Health care costs / Health care policy / Health Informatics / Health insurance / Health services / Health technology assessment / Hospitalization / Hospitals / Innovation / Insurance coverage / Managed competition / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Multiprocessing / Nursing Research / Opportunity cost / Prescription drugs / Prices / Priority setting / Public Health / Rationing / Reimbursement / Research Article / Technology / Utilization