MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
Journal Article

Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique has garnered significant attention for its little paraspinal iatrogenic damage, expedited recovery, and low complication rates. This method is also applicable to open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the outcomes associated with unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods The study examined the outcomes of 79 patients with Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level intervertebral fusion. Clinical assessments included the measurement of pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), surgical data, and demographic information. Imaging techniques were utilized to evaluate the fusion rate. Results The VAS-Back demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in Group UBE-TLIF compared to the other groups at the one-week postoperative evaluation ( p  < .05). Additionally, the UBE-TLIF group exhibited a significantly longer total operative time compared to the other groups ( p  < .05). However, it was noted that the Postop Hemovac drain were significantly greater in the MIS-TLIF and TLIF groups compared to the UBE-TLIF group ( p  < .05). Conclusions The present research demonstrated the effectiveness of UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and TLIF as surgical approaches for treating Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Among these methods, UBE-TLIF demonstrated a reduction in Postop Hemovac drain, and an increase in operative duration.