Journal Article

Individual social contact data and population mobility data as early markers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics during the first wave in Germany—an analysis based on the COVIMOD study

Rübsamen, Nicole, Wittenberg, Ian, Berger, Tom, Jaeger, Veronika K., Karch, André, Tomori, Damilola Victoria, Scholz, Stefan, Horn, Johannes, Kuhlmann, Alexander, Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Walde, Jasmin, Lange, Berit

2021

Overview

Background The effect of contact reduction measures on infectious disease transmission can only be assessed indirectly and with considerable delay. However, individual social contact data and population mobility data can offer near real-time proxy information. The aim of this study is to compare social contact data and population mobility data with respect to their ability to reflect transmission dynamics during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany. Methods We quantified the change in social contact patterns derived from self-reported contact survey data collected by the German COVIMOD study from 04/2020 to 06/2020 (compared to the pre-pandemic period from previous studies) and estimated the percentage mean reduction over time. We compared these results as well as the percentage mean reduction in population mobility data (corrected for pre-pandemic mobility) with and without the introduction of scaling factors and specific weights for different types of contacts and mobility to the relative reduction in transmission dynamics measured by changes in R values provided by the German Public Health Institute. Results We observed the largest reduction in social contacts (90%, compared to pre-pandemic data) in late April corresponding to the strictest contact reduction measures. Thereafter, the reduction in contacts dropped continuously to a minimum of 73% in late June. Relative reduction of infection dynamics derived from contact survey data underestimated the one based on reported R values in the time of strictest contact reduction measures but reflected it well thereafter. Relative reduction of infection dynamics derived from mobility data overestimated the one based on reported R values considerably throughout the study. After the introduction of a scaling factor, specific weights for different types of contacts and mobility reduced the mean absolute percentage error considerably; in all analyses, estimates based on contact data reflected measured R values better than those based on mobility. Conclusions Contact survey data reflected infection dynamics better than population mobility data, indicating that both data sources cover different dimensions of infection dynamics. The use of contact type-specific weights reduced the mean absolute percentage errors to less than 1%. Measuring the changes in mobility alone is not sufficient for understanding the changes in transmission dynamics triggered by public health measures.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Age / Biomedicine / Contact patterns / Contact surveys / Contact tracing / Control / Coronaviruses / COVID-19 / Disease control / Disease transmission / Dynamics / Epidemics / Error analysis / Germany / Households / Infections / Infectious diseases / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mobility / Pandemic / Pandemics / Polls & surveys / Population / Public health / Questionnaires / Research Article / Scaling factors / Severe acute respiratory syndrome / Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 / Social interactions / Social research / Spatial behavior / Statistics / Trends / Viral diseases