MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
Journal Article

Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background As a common disease in orthopedic clinics, popliteal cysts often coexist with intra-articular lesions. Compared with traditional open surgery, arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts is less traumatic, and intra-articular lesions can be treated. The ‘one-way valve’ mechanism of the popliteal cyst can be removed by expanding the communication between the articular cavity and the cyst to avoid cyst recurrence. In terms of arthroscopic techniques, the comparison of clinical effects between the double posteromedial portal (DPP) and single posteromedial portal (SPP) has rarely been studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical effects of DPP and SPP. Methods A total of 46 consecutive patients with symptomatic popliteal cysts who underwent arthroscopic treatment were included in this study and followed for approximately 1 year. All patients were divided into two groups according to the arthroscopic portals (DPP group and SPP group). The cyst size, Lysholm score and Rauschening–Lindgren (R–L) grade were evaluated before the operation for all patients, and the intra-articular lesions, operative time and complications were recorded after operation. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score and R–L grade were recorded, and magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate the outcome of the cyst. The clinical data of the two groups was statistically compared and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences in preoperative cyst size, Lysholm score or R–L grade between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). The operation time of the DPP group (67.52 ± 18.23 min) was longer than that of the SPP group (55.95 ± 16.40 min) ( P  = 0.030), but the recurrence rate of cysts in the DPP group (0%) was obviously lower than that in the SPP group (19.0%) ( P  = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the Lysholm score, R–L grade or complication rate between the two groups at the last follow-up ( P  > 0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts using double posteromedial portals was a safe and effective surgical method. Trial registration : ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200060115. Registered 19 May 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133199