Journal Article

Mobilizing social support networks to improve cancer screening: the COACH randomized controlled trial study design

Mbah, Olive, Dobs, Adrian S., Bowie, Janice, Ford, Jean G., Wenzel, Jennifer, Qiu, Miaozhen, Towson, Michele, Bone, Lee, Slade, Jimmie L., Elmi, Ahmed

2015

Overview

Background Disadvantaged populations face many barriers to cancer care, including limited support in navigating through the complexities of the healthcare system. Family members play an integral role in caring for patients and provide valuable care coordination; however, the effect of family navigators on adherence to cancer screening has not previously been evaluated. Training and evaluating trusted family members and other support persons may improve cancer outcomes for vulnerable patients. Methods Guided by principles of community based participatory research (CBPR), “Evaluating Coaches of Older Adults for Cancer Care and Healthy Behaviors (COACH)” is a community-based randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a trained participant-designated coach (support person or care giver) in navigating cancer-screening for older African American adults, 50–74 years old. Participants are randomly assigned as dyads (participant + coach pair) to receiving either printed educational materials only (PEM—control group) or educational materials plus coach training (COACH—intervention group). We defined a coach as family member, friend, or other lay support person designated by the older adult. The coach training is designed as a one-time, 35- to 40-minute training consisting of: 1) a didactic session that covers the role of the coach, basic facts about colorectal, breast and cervical cancers (including risk factors, signs and symptoms and screening modalities), engaging the healthcare provider in cancer screening, insurance coverage for screening, and related healthcare issues, 2) three video skits addressing misconceptions about and planning for cancer screening, and 3) an interactive role-play session with the trainer to reinforce and practice strategies for encouraging the participant to get screened. The primary study outcome is the difference in the proportion of participants completing at least one of the recommended screenings (for breast, cervix or colorectal cancer) between the control and intervention groups. Discussion Building on trusted patient contacts to encourage cancer screening, COACH is a highly sustainable intervention in a high-risk population. It has the potential to minimize the effect of mistrust of the medical establishment on screening behaviors by mobilizing participants’ existing support networks. If effective, the intervention could have a high impact on health care disparities research across multiple diseases. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01613430 ). Registered June 5, 2012

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: African Americans / Aged / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Cancer Research / Care and treatment / Clinical trials / Colorectal cancer / Community Health Services - organization & administration / Complications and side effects / Consumer Health Information - methods / Diagnosis / Early Detection of Cancer / Epidemiology / Female / Health aspects / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Humans / Male / Maryland / Mass Screening / Medicine/Public Health / Middle Aged / Mortality / Neoplasms - diagnosis / Oncology / prevention and public health / Research Design / Social Support / Socioeconomic factors / Study Protocol / Surgical Oncology