Journal Article

Hypnosis for unplanned procedural pain in the intensive care unit: the HYPIC randomized clinical trial

Terzi, Nicolas, Verdes, Adeline, Tadié, Jean-Marc, Massart, Nicolas, Mercier, Nathalie, Adeux, Marie-Pierre, Fillâtre, Pierre, Pedrono, Kristell, Maamar, Adel, Debarre, Matthieu, Revest, Matthieu, Faleur, Claude, Anne, Magali, Poilvet, Noémie, Gacouin, Arnaud, Laviolle, Bruno

2025

Overview

Background Pain and anxiety are frequent among critically ill patients undergoing unplanned invasive procedures, and pharmacological pain relief is not always possible. Although hypnosis is widely used in planned painful procedures, studies are lacking in this specific setting. Thus, we aimed to assess whether hypnosis plus standard care reduced pain and anxiety in critically ill patients undergoing an unplanned invasive procedure in comparison to standard care. Methods The HYPIC trial was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial of hypnosis during unplanned invasive procedures versus standard care for critically ill patients conducted in two French intensive care units (ICUs) from December 27, 2019, to January 25, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive hypnosis plus standard care by trained healthcare providers or standard care. The hypnotherapists were in the room for both arms to maintain blindness. The primary endpoint was the difference in pain level experienced during the invasive procedure assessed immediately after the end of the procedure between the two groups. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level, lidocaine consumption and stress experienced by the ICU nurses in charge of the patients. Results We included 78 patients. The pain level, assessed with a numeric pain scale (range, 0–10), was not significantly different between the two groups (2.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3, difference 0 pts [95% CI -1.3; 1.3], p  = 0.89). The level of anxiety was significantly lower in the hypnosis group (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 4.1 ± 3, difference − 1.7 [-3; -0.4], p  = 0.01), as was the level of stress experienced by the ICU nurses (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5, difference − 0.8 [-1.3;-0.3], p  = 0.003), and the patients were three times less likely to require increased lidocaine consumption (odds ratio: 0.3 [0.13–0.84], p  = 0.02) in the hypnosis group. Conclusion While hypnosis did not result in a statistically significant reduction in unplanned procedural pain, it seems to reduce anxiety, increase comfort, and reduce the stress level of healthcare providers. Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04129333) on 14 October 2019, before the first patient was enrolled.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Adult / Aged / Analgesics / Anesthesia / Anxiety / Anxiety - therapy / Care and treatment / Catheters / Critical Care Medicine / Critically ill / Delirium / Drug dosages / Emergency Medicine / Female / France / Hospital costs / Humans / Hypnosis / Hypnosis - methods / Hypnosis - statistics & numerical data / Hypnotism / Hypotension / Intensive / Intensive care / Intensive Care Units - organization & administration / Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data / Length of stay / Life Sciences / Male / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Middle Aged / Missing data / Pain / Pain Management - methods / Pain Management - standards / Pain Measurement - methods / Pain, Procedural - psychology / Pain, Procedural - therapy / Patients / Risk factors / Single-Blind Method / Statistical analysis / Stress / The future of Intensive Care Medicine