Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education
by
Zheng, Qing-Kang
, Hu, Kang
, Ma, Chao
, Sun, Zhi-Gang
, Ma, Rui-Jie
in
Behavioral Objectives
/ BOPPPS model
/ Chest
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice
/ Control Groups
/ Course Content
/ Education
/ Knowledge
/ Learning
/ Lung cancer
/ Medical Education
/ Methods
/ Questionnaires
/ Self study
/ Students
/ Surgery
/ Teachers
/ Teaching methods
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Thoracic surgery
/ Thoracic surgery education
/ Traditional instructional approach
/ Undergraduate Students
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education
by
Zheng, Qing-Kang
, Hu, Kang
, Ma, Chao
, Sun, Zhi-Gang
, Ma, Rui-Jie
in
Behavioral Objectives
/ BOPPPS model
/ Chest
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice
/ Control Groups
/ Course Content
/ Education
/ Knowledge
/ Learning
/ Lung cancer
/ Medical Education
/ Methods
/ Questionnaires
/ Self study
/ Students
/ Surgery
/ Teachers
/ Teaching methods
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Thoracic surgery
/ Thoracic surgery education
/ Traditional instructional approach
/ Undergraduate Students
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education
by
Zheng, Qing-Kang
, Hu, Kang
, Ma, Chao
, Sun, Zhi-Gang
, Ma, Rui-Jie
in
Behavioral Objectives
/ BOPPPS model
/ Chest
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice
/ Control Groups
/ Course Content
/ Education
/ Knowledge
/ Learning
/ Lung cancer
/ Medical Education
/ Methods
/ Questionnaires
/ Self study
/ Students
/ Surgery
/ Teachers
/ Teaching methods
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Thoracic surgery
/ Thoracic surgery education
/ Traditional instructional approach
/ Undergraduate Students
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education
Journal Article
Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
BOPPPS (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) is a student-centered modular teaching model that improves classroom teaching effectiveness. This study’s primary aim was to explore whether the BOPPPS model has advantages over traditional instructional approaches in teaching lung cancer courses to clinical medical interns.
Methods
A total of 88 students majoring in clinical medicine of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong University, who had clinical practice in thoracic surgery from January 2018 to December 2019, were divided into two groups, receiving the same lung cancer teaching content. The experimental group (
n
= 44) utilized the BOPPPS model, while the control group (
n
= 44) used the traditional instructional approach. A questionnaire was used to attain the students’ satisfaction and self-evaluation of the course, and a post-study examination was used to assess end-of-course performance.
Results
The experimental group’s theoretical examination scores with the BOPPPS teaching model were significantly higher than those in the control group. Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the traditional instructional approach in course satisfaction, student–teacher interaction, learning initiative, analytical ability, clinical thinking ability, and self-study ability (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions
Compared with the traditional instructional approach. The BOPPPS model can better inspire clinical medical students’ enthusiasm for thoracic surgery and enhance the students' comprehensive ability. In a word, the BOPPPS model has better teaching effectiveness in the clinical teaching practice of thoracic surgery, which is worthy of reference and popularization.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.