Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
by
Tricco, Andrea C.
, Shamseer, Larissa
, Page, Matthew J.
in
Bibliometrics
/ Biomedicine
/ Five years of Systematic Reviews
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methodology
/ Quality
/ Registration
/ Reporting
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Systematic reviews
/ Systematic Reviews as Topic
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
by
Tricco, Andrea C.
, Shamseer, Larissa
, Page, Matthew J.
in
Bibliometrics
/ Biomedicine
/ Five years of Systematic Reviews
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methodology
/ Quality
/ Registration
/ Reporting
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Systematic reviews
/ Systematic Reviews as Topic
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
by
Tricco, Andrea C.
, Shamseer, Larissa
, Page, Matthew J.
in
Bibliometrics
/ Biomedicine
/ Five years of Systematic Reviews
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methodology
/ Quality
/ Registration
/ Reporting
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Systematic reviews
/ Systematic Reviews as Topic
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Journal Article
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) was launched in February 2011 to increase transparency of systematic reviews (SRs). There have been few investigations of the content and use of the database. We aimed to investigate the number of PROSPERO registrations from inception to 2017, and website usage in the last year. We also aimed to explore the epidemiological characteristics of and completeness of primary outcome pre-specification in a sample of PROSPERO records from 2017.
Methods
The PROSPERO database managers provided us with data on the annual and cumulative number of SR registrations up to October 10, 2017, and the number of visits to the PROSPERO website over the year preceding October 10, 2017. One author collected data on the focus of the SR (e.g. therapeutic, diagnostic), health area addressed, funding source and completeness of outcome pre-specification in a random sample of 150 records of SRs registered in PROSPERO between April 1, 2017 and September 30, 2017.
Results
As of October 10, 2017, there were 26,535 SRs registered in PROSPERO; guided by current monthly submission rates, we anticipate this figure will reach over 30,000 by the end of 2017. There has been a 10-fold increase in registrations, from 63 SRs per month in 2012 to 800 per month in 2017. In the year preceding October 10, 2017, the PROSPERO website received more than 1.75 million page views. In the random sample of 150 registered SRs, the majority were focused on a therapeutic question (78/150 [52%]), while only a few focused on a diagnostic/prognostic question (11/150 [7%]). The 150 registered SRs addressed 18 different health areas. Any information about the primary outcome other than the domain (e.g. timing, effect measures) was not pre-specified in 44/150 records (29%).
Conclusions
Registration of SRs in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 and 2017, thus benefiting users of health evidence who want to know about ongoing SRs. Further work is needed to explore how closely published SRs adhere to the planned methods, whether greater pre-specification of outcomes prevents selective inclusion and reporting of study results, and whether registered SRs address necessary questions.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BMC
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.