Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes?
by
Han, Feifei
in
Biology and Life Sciences
/ Classrooms
/ Cluster analysis
/ Collaborative learning
/ Computer and Information Sciences
/ Distance learning
/ Education
/ Educational objectives
/ Evaluation
/ Flipped classroom
/ Higher education
/ Instructional design
/ Learning
/ Learning activities
/ Learning analytics
/ Learning management systems
/ Learning strategies
/ Methods
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Self report
/ Social Sciences
/ Student retention
/ Students
/ Tabulation
/ Teaching
/ Undergraduate study
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes?
by
Han, Feifei
in
Biology and Life Sciences
/ Classrooms
/ Cluster analysis
/ Collaborative learning
/ Computer and Information Sciences
/ Distance learning
/ Education
/ Educational objectives
/ Evaluation
/ Flipped classroom
/ Higher education
/ Instructional design
/ Learning
/ Learning activities
/ Learning analytics
/ Learning management systems
/ Learning strategies
/ Methods
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Self report
/ Social Sciences
/ Student retention
/ Students
/ Tabulation
/ Teaching
/ Undergraduate study
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes?
by
Han, Feifei
in
Biology and Life Sciences
/ Classrooms
/ Cluster analysis
/ Collaborative learning
/ Computer and Information Sciences
/ Distance learning
/ Education
/ Educational objectives
/ Evaluation
/ Flipped classroom
/ Higher education
/ Instructional design
/ Learning
/ Learning activities
/ Learning analytics
/ Learning management systems
/ Learning strategies
/ Methods
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Self report
/ Social Sciences
/ Student retention
/ Students
/ Tabulation
/ Teaching
/ Undergraduate study
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes?
Journal Article
Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes?
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Using Student Approaches to Learning research as a theoretical framework, the present study used both self-reported and observational log data to understand students’ study approaches in a flipped classroom course amongst 143 computer science undergraduate students. Specifically, it aimed to examine: 1) to what extent students’ study approaches identified by self-reported and observational log data are consistent with each other; and 2) to what extent students’ academic learning outcomes differ between students who showed consistent and inconsistent study approaches by self-reported and observational log data. Using The Revised Study Process Questionnaire, students were clustered as reporting either a Deep or a Surface Study Approach. Using frequencies of students’ participation in five online learning activities, they were classified as adopting either an Active or a Passive Study Approach. A 2 x 2 cross-tabulation showed a positive and moderate association between clusters of students’ study approaches resulted from two types of data. Amongst students who self-reported a Deep Study Approach, the proportion of students who adopted an Active Study Approach (80.7%) was significantly higher than those who adopted a Passive Study Approach (19.3%). In contrast, of the students who self-reported a Surface Study Approach, the proportion of students who used a Passive Study Approach (51.2%) was significantly higher than those who used an Active Study Approach (48.8%). Furthermore, students who had good study approaches by both self-report and observation did not differ from students who adopted an Active study approach by observation but reported a Surface Study Approach on course grades. Likewise, there was no significant difference in terms of academic learning outcomes between those who had poor study approaches by both self-report and observation and those who adopted Passive study approach by observation but reported a Deep Study Approach. Future studies may consider incorporating some qualitative methods in order to find out possible reasons behind the inconsistencies between self-reported and observed study approaches.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.