Journal Article

High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students

Ohlenburg, Hendrik, Zarbock, Alexander, Massoth, Christina, Pöpping, Daniel M., Röder, Hannah, Hessler, Michael, Wenk, Manuel

2019

Overview

Background Simulation has become integral to the training of both undergraduate medical students and medical professionals. Due to the increasing degree of realism and range of features, the latest mannequins are referred to as high-fidelity simulators. Whether increased realism leads to a general improvement in trainees’ outcomes is currently controversial and there are few data on the effects of these simulators on participants’ personal confidence and self-assessment. Methods One-hundred-and-thirty-five fourth-year medical students were randomly allocated to participate in either a high- or a low-fidelity simulated Advanced Life Support training session. Theoretical knowledge and self-assessment pre- and post-tests were completed. Students’ performance in simulated scenarios was recorded and rated by experts. Results Participants in both groups showed a significant improvement in theoretical knowledge in the post-test as compared to the pre-test, without significant intergroup differences. Performance, as assessed by video analysis, was comparable between groups, but, unexpectedly, the low-fidelity group had significantly better results in several sub-items. Irrespective of the findings, participants of the high-fidelity group considered themselves to be advantaged, solely based on their group allocation, compared with those in the low-fidelity group, at both pre- and post-self-assessments. Self-rated confidence regarding their individual performance was also significantly overrated. Conclusion The use of high-fidelity simulation led to equal or even worse performance and growth in knowledge as compared to low-fidelity simulation, while also inducing undesirable effects such as overconfidence. Hence, in this study, it was not beneficial compared to low-fidelity, but rather proved to be an adverse learning tool.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Assessment and evaluation of admissions / Cognitive biases / College students / Correlation / Education / Educational aspects / Evaluation / Fidelity / Knowledge / Learning / Likert Scales / Medical / Medical Education / Medical personnel / Medical personnel training / Medical students / Multiple Choice Tests / Overconfidence / Overconfidence (Psychology) / Patient simulation / Psychological aspects / Realism / Research Article / Self evaluation / Simulation / skills and attitudes / Students / Studies / Teaching Methods / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Trainees / Training