Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation
by
Tötsch, Niklas
, Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Balanced accuracy
/ Binary classification
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Bookmaker informedness
/ Classification
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Confusion matrices
/ Confusion matrix
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Datasets
/ Learning algorithms
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Markedness
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Robustness (mathematics)
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation
by
Tötsch, Niklas
, Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Balanced accuracy
/ Binary classification
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Bookmaker informedness
/ Classification
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Confusion matrices
/ Confusion matrix
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Datasets
/ Learning algorithms
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Markedness
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Robustness (mathematics)
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation
by
Tötsch, Niklas
, Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Balanced accuracy
/ Binary classification
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Bookmaker informedness
/ Classification
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Confusion matrices
/ Confusion matrix
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Datasets
/ Learning algorithms
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Markedness
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Robustness (mathematics)
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation
Journal Article
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Evaluating binary classifications is a pivotal task in statistics and machine learning, because it can influence decisions in multiple areas, including for example prognosis or therapies of patients in critical conditions. The scientific community has not agreed on a general-purpose statistical indicator for evaluating two-class confusion matrices (having true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives) yet, even if advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over accuracy and F
1
score have already been shown.In this manuscript, we reaffirm that MCC is a robust metric that summarizes the classifier performance in a single value, if positive and negative cases are of equal importance. We compare MCC to other metrics which value positive and negative cases equally: balanced accuracy (BA), bookmaker informedness (BM), and markedness (MK). We explain the mathematical relationships between MCC and these indicators, then show some use cases and a bioinformatics scenario where these metrics disagree and where MCC generates a more informative response.Additionally, we describe three exceptions where BM can be more appropriate: analyzing classifications where dataset prevalence is unrepresentative, comparing classifiers on different datasets, and assessing the random guessing level of a classifier. Except in these cases, we believe that MCC is the most informative among the single metrics discussed, and suggest it as standard measure for scientists of all fields. A Matthews correlation coefficient close to +1, in fact, means having high values for all the other confusion matrix metrics. The same cannot be said for balanced accuracy, markedness, bookmaker informedness, accuracy and F
1
score.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.