Journal Article

Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Greystoke, Alastair, Dew, Rosie, Rice, Stephen, Johnell, Kristina, Norris, Ruth P., Sharp, Linda, Todd, Adam

2020

Overview

Background Novel biological and precision therapies and their associated predictive biomarker tests offer opportunities for increased tumor response, reduced adverse effects, and improved survival. This systematic review determined if there are socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and/or biological and precision cancer therapies. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies, published in English between January 1998 and December 2019. Observational studies reporting utilization data for predictive biomarker tests and/or cancer biological and precision therapies by a measure of socio-economic status (SES) were eligible. Data was extracted from eligible studies. A modified ISPOR checklist for retrospective database studies was used to assess study quality. Meta-analyses were undertaken using a random-effects model, with sub-group analyses by cancer site and drug class. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for each study. Pooled utilization ORs for low versus high socio-economic groups were calculated for test and therapy receipt. Results Among 10,722 citations screened, 62 papers (58 studies; 8 test utilization studies, 37 therapy utilization studies, 3 studies on testing and therapy, 10 studies without denominator populations or which only reported mean socio-economic status) met the inclusion criteria. Studies reported on 7 cancers, 5 predictive biomarkers tests, and 11 biological and precision therapies. Thirty-eight studies (including 1,036,125 patients) were eligible for inclusion in meta-analyses. Low socio-economic status was associated with modestly lower predictive biomarker test utilization (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.05; 10 studies) and significantly lower biological and precision therapy utilization (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91; 30 studies). Associations with therapy utilization were stronger in lung cancer (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–1.00; 6 studies), than breast cancer (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78–1.10; 8 studies). The mean study quality score was 6.9/10. Conclusions These novel results indicate that there are socio-economic inequalities in predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapy utilization. This requires further investigation to prevent differences in outcomes due to inequalities in treatment with biological and precision therapies.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Analysis / Biological products / Biological therapy / Biomarkers / Biomarkers, Tumor - economics / Biomedicine / Breast cancer / Cancer / Cancer therapies / Cancer treatment / Chemotherapy / Confidence intervals / Drug utilization / Economic analysis / Economic aspects / Family income / Female / Health aspects / Humans / Immunotherapy / Immunotherapy - methods / Lung cancer / Male / Medical diagnosis / Medical research / Medical tests / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Melanoma / Meta-analysis / Molecular targeted therapy / Neoplasms - diagnosis / Neoplasms - economics / Patients / Pharmacogenomic testing / Population studies / Precision medicine / Precision Medicine - economics / Precision Medicine - methods / Quality assessment / Research Article / Retrospective Studies / Socioeconomic Factors / Socioeconomics / Systematic review / Therapy / Utilization