MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting
Journal Article

Comparison of three real-time polymerase chain reaction protocols for the diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that mostly affects inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa. With rising global migration, imported cases of schistosomiasis are increasingly being reported in non-endemic countries, where diagnosis is hindered by low parasite burdens and multiple Schistosoma species. Microscopy remains the gold standard, despite its limitations, whereas molecular techniques offer greater sensitivity. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols for the detection, at an international health centre in Barcelona, of imported cases of urogenital and intestinal schistosomiasis. Methods This cross-sectional study included 75 adults from sub-Saharan Africa attending the Drassanes-Vall d’Hebron International Health Unit, Barcelona, between May 2023 and February 2024. Paired urine and stool samples were collected. Microscopy was performed on all samples. Urine was analysed by real-time PCR using the Dra1 target sequence. Stool was tested by three protocols targeting, respectively, Dra1, Sm1-7, and 28S rRNA. Schistosoma infection was confirmed by microscopic identification of eggs and/or parasite DNA detection by real-time PCR. Results Schistosomiasis was confirmed in 12/75 patients (16%). Urogenital schistosomiasis was diagnosed in 3/75 cases; the performance values of real-time PCR in urine samples were not assessed. In stool, the pan- Schistosoma real-time PCR showed 55.6% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity, with a moderate agreement ( κ  = 0.631) with microscopy. The Sm1-7 assay fully matched microscopy for Schistosoma mansoni detection, and reached 100% sensitivity and specificity. A novel contribution of this study is the application of a real-time PCR assay targeting the Dra1 repetitive sequence in stool samples for the detection of Schistosoma intercalatum/Schistosoma guineensis . All of the microscopy-positive cases were real-time PCR positive, and one additional infection was detected by real-time PCR, which meant that 100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity were achieved with this technique. Conclusions Our findings underscore the need for accurate diagnostic tools for cases of imported schistosomiasis in non-endemic settings. Microscopy remains the reference standard, while the pan- Schistosoma real-time PCR showed limited sensitivity for stool samples. In contrast, the Sm1-7 and Dra1 assays demonstrated higher sensitivity and strong concordance with microscopy, with Dra1 also proving useful for the detection of S. intercalatum / S. guineensis in stool. Graphical abstract