Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
Do you wish to request the book?
Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
2015
Overview
Background: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) is a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the Chinese CIDI in diagnosing mental disorders in psychiatric settings.
Methods: We recruited 208 participants, of whom 148 were patients from two psychiatric hospitals and 60 healthy people from communities. These participants were administered with CIDI by six trained lay interviewers and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I, gold standard) by two psychiatrists. Agreement between CIDI and SCID-I was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Individual-level CIDI-SCID diagnostic concordance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and Cohen′s K.
Results: Substantial to excellent CIDI to SCID concordance was found for any substance use disorder (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.926), any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.807) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.806). The concordance between the CIDI and the SCID for psychotic and eating disorders is moderate. However, for individual mental disorders, the CIDI-SCID concordance for bipolar disorders (AUC = 0.55) and anorexia nervosa (AUC = 0.50) was insufficient.
Conclusions: Overall, the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has acceptable validity in diagnosing the substance use disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder among Chinese adult population. However, we should be cautious when using it for bipolar disorders and anorexia nervosa.
Publisher
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd,Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies,Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health(Peking University), Beijing 100191, China,Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd,Wolters Kluwer
Subject
/ Anorexia Nervosa - diagnosis
/ Anxiety
/ Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis
/ Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis
/ Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
/ Drug use
/ Female
/ Fourth Edition Axis I Disorders; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity
/ Humans
/ International Classification of Diseases
/ Male
/ Methods
/ Original
/ Patients
/ Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards
/ Studies
/ Validity
