MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments
Journal Article

Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: a cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly important in healthcare. It is therefore crucial that today’s medical students have certain basic AI skills that enable them to use AI applications successfully. These basic skills are often referred to as “AI literacy”. Previous research projects that aimed to investigate medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI have not used reliable and validated assessment instruments. Methods We used two validated self-assessment scales to measure AI literacy (31 Likert-type items) and attitudes towards AI (5 Likert-type items) at two German medical schools. The scales were distributed to the medical students through an online questionnaire. The final sample consisted of a total of 377 medical students. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis and calculated the internal consistency of the scales to check whether the scales were sufficiently reliable to be used in our sample. In addition, we calculated t-tests to determine group differences and Pearson’s and Kendall’s correlation coefficients to examine associations between individual variables. Results The model fit and internal consistency of the scales were satisfactory. Within the concept of AI literacy, we found that medical students at both medical schools rated their technical understanding of AI significantly lower ( M MS1 = 2.85 and M MS2 = 2.50) than their ability to critically appraise ( M MS1 = 4.99 and M MS2 = 4.83) or practically use AI ( M MS1 = 4.52 and M MS2 = 4.32), which reveals a discrepancy of skills. In addition, female medical students rated their overall AI literacy significantly lower than male medical students, t (217.96) = -3.65, p  <.001. Students in both samples seemed to be more accepting of AI than fearful of the technology, t (745.42) = 11.72, p  <.001. Furthermore, we discovered a strong positive correlation between AI literacy and positive attitudes towards AI and a weak negative correlation between AI literacy and negative attitudes. Finally, we found that prior AI education and interest in AI is positively correlated with medical students’ AI literacy. Conclusions Courses to increase the AI literacy of medical students should focus more on technical aspects. There also appears to be a correlation between AI literacy and attitudes towards AI, which should be considered when planning AI courses.