Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross‐sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross‐sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives
Do you wish to request the book?
Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross‐sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross‐sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives
2025
Overview
Background The 2022 revised version of the Model Core Curriculum (MCC) for Medical Education in Japan includes “generalism” as a new expertise quality and ability, based on the results of surveys of experts in health professions education. However, the perspectives of medical trainees under the pre‐2022 MCC revision were under‐examined. Here, we investigated what these trainees felt they had learned about general medicine (GM)‐related topics. Methods We performed a nationwide cross‐sectional study using an anonymous online questionnaire, which was developed with reference to the 2022 revised MCC. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items. For all items, we asked, “Did you learn enough during medical school?” Respondents were asked to respond on a 5‐point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Results Three hundred and eighty‐six participants (response rate 55.4%) were included in the analysis. For the item “Behavioral science,” the number of participants who chose “3 = neither agree nor disagree” was highest, at 171 (44.3%) and with an average of 3.28, indicating that this item was perceived as insufficiently studied. Approximately half of the participants chose “4 = agree” for all items other than “Behavioral science.” Conclusions The study suggested that behavioral science may be underlearned among medical trainees of the pre‐2022 MCC generation. Medical educators in Japan should formulate curricula in accordance with the 2022 revision MCC and improve curricula regarding behavioral science. Future research should survey the generation of trainees who receive 2022 revision MCC‐compliant medical education; comparison of results with those of this study would be valuable in examining the effects of the revised guideline and inform international medical educators.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
Subject
