Journal Article

A quantitative evaluation of the impact of vaccine roll-out rate and coverage on reducing deaths: insights from the first 2 years of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran

Sepanta Hosseinpour, Kaveh Madani, Shahram Kordasti, Somayeh Rostamian, Stefan Dascalu, Kiarash Aramesh, Mahan Ghafari, Mohammad Saeid Rezaee-Zavareh

2023

Overview

Background Vaccination has played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of COVID-19. Despite numerous studies highlighting its benefits in reducing the risk of severe disease and death, we still lack a quantitative understanding of how varying vaccination roll-out rates influence COVID-19 mortality. Methods We developed a framework for estimating the number of avertable COVID-19 deaths (ACDs) by vaccination in Iran. To achieve this, we compared Iran’s vaccination roll-out rates with those of eight model countries that predominantly used inactivated virus vaccines. We calculated net differences in the number of fully vaccinated individuals under counterfactual scenarios where Iran’s per-capita roll-out rate was replaced with that of the model countries. This, in turn, enabled us to determine age specific ACDs for the Iranian population under counterfactual scenarios where number of COVID-19 deaths are estimated using all-cause mortality data. These estimates covered the period from the start of 2020 to 20 April 2022. Results We found that while Iran would have had an approximately similar number of fully vaccinated individuals under counterfactual roll-out rates based on Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Turkey (~ 65–70%), adopting Turkey’s roll-out rates could have averted 50,000 (95% confidence interval: 38,100–53,500) additional deaths, while following Bangladesh’s rates may have resulted in 52,800 (17,400–189,500) more fatalities in Iran. Surprisingly, mimicking Argentina’s slower roll-out led to only 12,600 (10,400–13,300) fewer deaths, despite a higher counterfactual percentage of fully vaccinated individuals (~ 79%). Emulating Montenegro or Bolivia, with faster per capita roll-out rates and approximately 50% counterfactual full vaccination, could have prevented more deaths in older age groups, especially during the early waves. Finally, replicating Bahrain’s model as an upper-bound benchmark, Iran could have averted 75,300 (56,000–83,000) deaths, primarily in the > 50 age groups. Conclusions Our analysis revealed that faster roll-outs were consistently associated with higher numbers of averted deaths, even in scenarios with lower overall coverage. This study offers valuable insights into future decision-making regarding infectious disease epidemic management through vaccination strategies. It accomplishes this by comparing various countries’ relative performance in terms of timing, pace, and vaccination coverage, ultimately contributing to the prevention of COVID-19-related deaths.

• Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC,BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Age / Age groups / Aged / Analysis / Bangladesh / Biomedicine / Communicable diseases / Comparative analysis / Confidence intervals / Counterfactual scenarios / COVID-19 / COVID-19 - epidemiology / COVID-19 - prevention & control / COVID-19 vaccines / Decision making / Disease transmission / Epidemics / Excess mortality / Fatalities / Female / Forecasts and trends / Geopolitics / Health aspects / Health behavior / Health risks / Humans / Immunization / Infection control / Infectious diseases / Iran / Iran - epidemiology / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Mortality / Pandemics / Per capita / Perinatal Death / Prevention / Public health / Quantitative analysis / R / Research Article / Upper bounds / Vaccination / Vaccination Coverage / Vaccines / Viral diseases / Viruses