Journal Article

The clinical value of minimal invasive autopsy in COVID-19 patients

Cartuyvels, Reinoud, Driessen, Ann, Donders, Elena, Vanrusselt, Jan, Vanden Abeele, Marie-Elena, Achten, Ruth, D’Onofrio, Valentino, Dendooven, Amelie, Lammens, Martin, Augsburg, Lukasz, Cox, Janneke, Dubois, Jasperina

2020

Overview

Minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is a validated and safe method to establish the cause of death (COD), mainly in low-resource settings. However, the additional clinical value of MIA in Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients in a high-resource setting is unknown. The objective was to assess if and how MIA changed clinical COD and contributing diagnoses in deceased COVID-19 patients. A prospective observational cohort from April to May 2020 in a 981-bed teaching hospital in the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium was established. Patients who died with either PCR-confirmed or radiologically confirmed COVID-19 infection were consecutively included. MIA consisted of whole-body CT and CT-guided Tru-Cut® biopsies. Diagnostic modalities were clinical chart review, radiology, microbiology, and histopathology which were assessed by two independent experts per modality. MIA COD and contributing diagnoses were established during a multi-disciplinary meeting. Clinical COD (CCOD) and contributing diagnosis were abstracted from the discharge letter. The main outcomes were alterations in CCOD and contributing diagnoses after MIA, and the contribution of each diagnostic modality. We included 18 patients, of which 7 after intensive care unit hospitalization. MIA led to an alteration in 15/18 (83%) patients. The CCOD was altered in 5/18 (28%) patients. MIA found a new COD (1/5), a more specific COD (1/5), a less certain COD (1/5), or a contributing diagnosis to be the COD (2/5). Contributing diagnoses were altered in 14/18 (78%) patients: 9 new diagnoses, 5 diagnoses dismissed, 3 made more specific, and 2 made less certain. Overall, histopathology contributed in 14/15 (93%) patients with alterations, radiology and microbiology each in 6/15 (40%), and clinical review in 3/15 (20%). Histopathology was deemed the most important modality in 10 patients, radiology in two patients, and microbiology in one patient. MIA, especially histological examination, can add valuable new clinical information regarding the cause of death in COVID-19 patients, even in a high-resource setting with wide access to premortem diagnostic modalities. MIA may provide important clinical insights and should be applied in the current ongoing pandemic. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04366882.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Aged / Autopsies / Autopsy / Belgium / Betacoronavirus - genetics / Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification / Biology and Life Sciences / Biopsy / Cause of Death / Computed tomography / Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis / Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging / Coronavirus Infections - pathology / Coronavirus Infections - virology / Coronaviruses / COVID-19 / Diagnosis / Diagnostic systems / Disease transmission / Female / Heart failure / Histopathology / Hospitals / Humans / Infectious diseases / Life sciences / Male / Medical diagnosis / Medical research / Medicine and Health Sciences / Methods / Microbiology / Pandemics / Pathology / Patients / Pneumonia / Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis / Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging / Pneumonia, Viral - pathology / Pneumonia, Viral - virology / Prospective Studies / Radiology / Research and Analysis Methods / RNA, Viral - metabolism / SARS-CoV-2 / Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Ventilators / Viral diseases