Journal Article

Comparison of two bovine serum pregnancy tests in detection of artificial insemination pregnancies and pregnancy loss in beef cattle

Northrop, Emmalee J., Rich, Jerica J. J., Perry, George A., Rhoades, Jim R.

2019

Overview

Blood tests for early detection of pregnancy in cattle based on pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) are commercially available. The objective of these studies were to compare the accuracy of blood tests to transrectal ultrasonography in detecting AI pregnancies, and to compare the accuracy of blood tests in predicting pregnancy loss. Beef cattle from 6 herds were synchronized using a recommended CIDR based protocol (Study 1: n = 460; Study 2: n = 472). Pregnancy status was determined by transrectal ultrasonography between days 28-40 following AI, blood samples were collected at this time. In study 2 a final pregnancy determination was performed at the end of the breeding season to determine pregnancy loss. Each serum sample was examined for PAG concentrations using a microtiter plate reader and/or scored by two technicians blind to pregnancy status and pregnancy loss. For study 1 Cohen's kappa statistics were calculated to assess the agreement between each test and transrectal ultrasonography. For study 2 data was analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with herd as a random effect, and loss, age, and their interaction included in the model. Agreement was good to very good for each test. There was no difference (P = 0.79) in sensitivity, but a difference (P<0.01) in specificity of the assays (88%, 64%, 87%, 90%) and in the overall percent correct (93%, 84%, 93%, 93%). There was an effect of pregnancy loss (P = 0.04), age (P = 0.0002), and their interaction (P = 0.06) on PAG concentrations. In conclusion both pregnancy tests were accurate at detecting AI pregnancies, and were in very good agreement with transrectal ultrasonography. Both tests detected differences in PAGs among females that maintained and lost pregnancy; however, prediction proved to be difficult as most females were above the threshold and would have been considered pregnant on the day of testing.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Abortion / Abortion, Spontaneous - blood / Abortion, Spontaneous - diagnosis / Accuracy / Analysis / Animal lactation / Animal sciences / Animals / Artificial insemination / Beef / Beef cattle / Biology and Life Sciences / Blood / Blood tests / Breeding / Breeding seasons / Cattle / Cattle Diseases - blood / Cattle Diseases - diagnosis / Cattle industry / Comparative analysis / Data processing / Diagnostic ultrasonography / Embryos / Females / Gene expression / Glycoproteins / Insemination, Artificial / Laboratories / Laboratory equipment / Livestock breeding / Medicine and Health Sciences / Miscarriage / Models, Biological / Mortality / People and Places / Predictions / Pregnancy / Pregnancy diagnosis / Pregnancy Tests - methods / Reproduction (biology) / Reproductive technologies / Research and Analysis Methods / Science Policy / Statistical analysis / Statistical methods / Statistical tests / Technicians / Ultrasonic imaging / Ultrasound / Zoology