Journal Article

Comparing individual-level clinical data from antenatal records with routine health information systems indicators for antenatal care in the West Bank: A cross-sectional study

Frøen, J. Frederik, Venkateswaran, Mahima, Awwad, Tamara, Abu Khader, Khadija, Ghanem, Buthaina, Mørkrid, Kjersti, Friberg, Ingrid K., Hijaz, Taghreed

2018

Overview

In most low- and middle-income settings, national aggregate health data is the most consistently available source for policy-making and international comparisons. In the West Bank, the paper-based health information system with manual aggregations is transitioning to an individual-level data eRegistry for maternal and child health at the point-of-care. The aim of this study was to explore beforehand how routine health information systems indicators for antenatal care can change with the introduction of the eRegistry. Data were collected from clinical antenatal paper records of pregnancy enrollments for 2015 from 17 primary healthcare clinics, selected by probability sampling from five districts in the West Bank. We used the individual-level data from clinical records to generate routinely reported health systems indicators. We weighted the data to produce population-level estimates, and compared these indicators with aggregate routine health information systems reports. Antenatal anemia screening at 36 weeks was 20% according to the clinical records data, compared to 52% in the routine reports. The clinical records data showed considerably higher incidences of key maternal conditions compared to the routine reports, including fundal height discrepancy (20% vs. 0.01%); Rh-negative blood group (6.8% vs. 1.4%); anemia with hemoglobin<9.5 g/dl (6% vs. 0.6%); and malpresentation at term (1.3% vs. 0.03%). Only about a sixth of cases with these conditions were referred according to guidelines to designated referral clinics. Differences between indicators from the clinical records data and routine health information systems reports can be attributed to human error, inconsistent denominators, and complexities of data processes. Key health systems indicators were prone to underestimations since their registration was dependent on referral of pregnant women. With a transition to individual-level data, as in the eRegistry under implementation, the public health authorities will be able to generate reliable health systems indicators reflective of the population's health status.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Adult / Analysis / Anemia / Anemia - epidemiology / Biology and Life Sciences / Blood groups / Child health / Childrens health / Clinical decision making / Cross-Sectional Studies / Data collection / Decision making / Diabetes / Empowerment / Female / Gestational diabetes / Glycosylated hemoglobin / Health aspects / Health care / Health Information Systems / Health screening / Health services / Health surveys / Hemoglobin / Hemoglobins / Human error / Human factors / Humans / Indicators / Information systems / Maternal & child health / Medical informatics / Medical records / Medicine and Health Sciences / Middle East - epidemiology / Mothers / People and Places / Population / Pregnancy / Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology / Pregnant women / Prenatal care / Prenatal Care - statistics & numerical data / Primary health care / Public health / Quality / Registries - statistics & numerical data / Reproductive health / Studies / Systematic review / Young Adult