Journal Article

Race and the Fragility of the Legal Distinction between Juveniles and Adults

Levine, Cynthia S., Dweck, Carol S., Rattan, Aneeta, Eberhardt, Jennifer L.

2012

Overview

Legal precedent establishes juvenile offenders as inherently less culpable than adult offenders and thus protects juveniles from the most severe of punishments. But how fragile might these protections be? In the present study, simply bringing to mind a Black (vs. White) juvenile offender led participants to view juveniles in general as significantly more similar to adults in their inherent culpability and to express more support for severe sentencing. Indeed, these differences in participants' perceptions of this foundational legal precedent distinguishing between juveniles and adults accounted for their greater support for severe punishment. These results highlight the fragility of protections for juveniles when race is in play. Furthermore, we suggest that this fragility may have broad implications for how juveniles are seen and treated in the criminal justice system.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Administration of criminal justice / Adolescent / Adult / Adults / Attitudes / Behavioral sciences / Black white differences / Capital punishment / Continental Population Groups / Crime / Criminal justice / Criminal justice system / Criminal Law / Criminal sentences / Culpability / Data Collection / Ethnicity / Female / Fragility / Humans / Judicial system / Juvenile Delinquency - legislation & jurisprudence / Juvenile offenders / Juveniles / Male / Mediation / Medicine / Middle Aged / Prejudice / Psychology / Public opinion / Punishment / Punishment - psychology / Race / Racial discrimination / Racism / Severity / Social and Behavioral Sciences / Social justice / Television news / United States / Voir dire