Journal Article

Cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review

Pandor, Abdullah, Smith, Jason E., Reid, Stuart, Sutton, Anthea, Essat, Munira, Surendra Kumar, Dhushy, Fothergill, Rachael, Perkins, Gavin D., Lecky, Fiona, Fuller, Gordon, Wilson, Mark H., Kolias, Angelos, Hutchinson, Peter

2024

Overview

To assess whether different cervical spine immobilisation strategies (full immobilisation, movement minimisation or no immobilisation), impact neurological and/or other outcomes for patients with suspected cervical spinal injury in the pre-hospital and emergency department setting. Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and two research registers were searched until September 2023. All comparative studies (prospective or retrospective) that examined the potential benefits and/or harms of immobilisation practices during pre-hospital and emergency care of patients with a potential cervical spine injury (pre-imaging) following blunt trauma. Two authors independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Data were synthesised without meta-analysis. Six observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was variable, with most studies having serious or critical risk of bias. The effect of cervical spine immobilisation practices such as full immobilisation or movement minimisation during pre-hospital and emergency care did not show clear evidence of benefit for the prevention of neurological deterioration, spinal injuries and death compared with no immobilisation. However, increased pain, discomfort and anatomical complications were associated with collar application during immobilisation. Despite the limited evidence, weak designs and limited generalisability, the available data suggest that pre-hospital cervical spine immobilisation (full immobilisation or movement minimisation) was of uncertain value due to the lack of demonstrable benefit and may lead to potential complications and adverse outcomes. High-quality randomised comparative studies are required to address this important question. PROSPERO REGISTRATION Fiona Lecky, Abdullah Pandor, Munira Essat, Anthea Sutton, Carl Marincowitz, Gordon Fuller, Stuart Reid, Jason Smith. A systematic review of cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022349600 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022349600.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Bias / Biology and Life Sciences / Blunt trauma / Care and treatment / Causes of / Cervical Vertebrae - injuries / Comparative analysis / Comparative studies / Complications and side effects / Criteria / Emergency medical care / Emergency Medical Services / Emergency medicine / Emergency Service, Hospital / Emergency services / Hospitals / Humans / Immobilization / Injuries / Injury prevention / Intracranial pressure / Medicine and Health Sciences / Meta-analysis / Methods / Mortality / Neck / Observational studies / Optimization / Orthopedic braces / Patients / Pressure ulcers / Research and Analysis Methods / Search strategies / Spinal cord injuries / Spinal Injuries - therapy / Spine / Spine (cervical) / Systematic review / Trauma / Traumatic brain injury / Wounds, Nonpenetrating - therapy